This is evident from the document NRK has had access to. On 18 March 2014 concluded Wiersholm that to give county financial and legal advice in connection with Fjord1 saddled not was EiT missions trengde to be attached out to tender.
Wiersholm shows among other things to a regulations to law and that there are exemptions for financial services in say grunngjeving that there was not a need to lay mission out to tender.
contested conclusion
the conclusion from Wiersholm is knit in violation of how lawyer Harald Alfsen look at the case. Alfsen who is an expert in public procurement, in EiT interview with Bergens Tidende usamd in conclusion that the mission not going anywhere postpone.
Lawyer Bjorg Ven who is also an expert on public procurement and that NRK has talked with, meiner for their part that there was not a need to add assignment out to tender.
experts other words usamde. The county’s control selection is no full-time with a separate fixed investigation of the case. Using Deloitte shall control the selection determine whether county burly Law on public procurement då The consultants lasted hyra .
Thanks for the assignment
18. March 2014, the same day as Wiersholm concluded that the mission not going anywhere postpone writing Inge Ekker Bartnes Wiersholm the county executive man.
In the letter it is stated among other things: “We thank you for having chosen us in the mission set out below, and are pleased to confirm the following conditions for the assignment. “
May cover catering
But from a six-page type divided into 18 main points it emerges how Wiersholm want it. It is, among other things revealed that county have paid in advance. In Section 3.4 we hear: “In addition to the fee we will charge the client for any expenses we incur in connection with the assignment, such as registration fees and expenses for registersøk, budsendinger, travel, hotel, catering or translation.”
NOK 2,500 per hour plus VAT
Also, the company DHT Corporative Services lasted engaged by the county and fekk assignment the same day, on March 18, 2014. But from a note with the heading “Annex 2 , terms and conditions »elapses between anna emerged that the company should have an hourly wage of 2,500 million excluding value added tax.
Fekk 16.5 million for wrong advice
the consultants have so far received 16.5 million for the advice, advice that would prove to be wrong. The consultants advised the nemleg county to willow shareholding in Fjord 1 to Torghatten, something the Competition Authority has stopped. In ein agreement with county obliged Torghatten themselves to cover the majority of consulting expenses if the Competition Authority selected to stop the purchase.
The county Selde nyleg their shareholdings to supply reiaren Per Sævik from Sunnmøre.
Wild reengage the consultants
Wiersholm and DHT Corporative Services decisively helped Sogn og Fjordane county in 2011 in connection with the dåverande cigar process Fjord1. This is the county administration used as’s decision to choose precisely these the companies also in 2014.
In an e-mail from the legal department Svein Hågård in county NRK dated 3 February this year to enter him, among other things follow: “Wiersholm and DHT notables in such a manner suitable for the case complex from before and it was therefore desirable for county to holding up to use these the consultants’.
taciturnity county executive men
Fylkesrådmann Tore Eriksen is taciturn when NRK he confronts with the case.
Fylkesrådmann Tore Eriksen wish not to answer why Wiersholm lasted leigd into to find out about doing consulting Fjord1 the case had to be attached out to tender. Wiersholm fekk mission after the company tax return stated that competition utsetjing was unnecessary.
Photo: Bård Siem / NRK
– Why lasted Wiersholm leigd in to find out about ein should enclose mission out to tender?
– this issue I wish to raise in connection with controls selection say process of handling the case, he says.
– Earlier have you been open that county ever has Wiersholm for advice and that you supported you on this conclusion. Why would you not do the same now?
– The question of whether we have followed the law will I look after me, but when control Committee has taken the matter Wasted ho there. Therefore will I respond Control Committee first, he says.
DHT Corporative Services wishes not to comment on the matter. Rather not Wiersholm wish to comment on the matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment