This goes out of the document NRK has gained access to. The 18. march 2014 concluded the law firm Wiersholm with that to give the county the financial and legal advice in connection with Fjord1-sales was not a mission that the two nights to be out on the anbod.
Wiersholm shows among other things a forskrifta to the law and that it is the exception for financial services in his reasoning that it was not necessary to lay the assignment out on the anbod.
the hotly contested conclusion
the Conclusion from Wiersholm is knit in conflict with how lawyer Harald Alfs look at the case. Alfs who is an expert on public procurement, in an interview with Bergens Tidende usamd in the conclusion that the mission not konkurranseutsetjast.
Lawyer Bjørg Ven, who also is an expert on public procurement and NRK have talked with, think on the side that it was not the need to put the contract out on the anbod.
Experts are, in other words, disagree. The county’s kontrollutval is now in full swing with a separate investigation of the case. With the help of the company Deloitte to kontrollutvalet find out about the county breaking the Law on public procurement and konsulentane was hired the.
Thank you for the mission
18. march 2014, the same day the Wiersholm concluded that the mission not konkurranseutsetjast, write Inge Spots Bartnes in Wiersholm to fylkesrådmannen.
In the letter, is called it among other things: “We are grateful that you have chosen us in the mission set forth below, and are delighted to be able to confirm the following conditions for the mission.”
Having to cover catering
In a six pages long type divided into 18 master point goes up how Wiersholm will have it. It goes between anna noted that the county must pay on forskot. In section 3.4, called it: “In addition to the fees we will charge the client for any expenses we incur in connection with the assignment, for example, set-up charges and the expenses of the registersøk, budsendinger, travel, hotel, catering or translation.”
2500 nok hour plus vat
Also, the company DHT Corporativ Services was engaged by the county, and was the mission the same day, the 18. march 2014. In a note with the overskrifta “Appendix 2, oppdragsvilkår” goes between anna, evidence that the company should have a timebetaling at 2500 nok exclusive vat.
Got 16,5 million for wrong advice
Konsulentane have so far been for 16.5 million for advice, advice that would prove to be wrong. Konsulentane rådd namely the county to sell the shares in Fjord1 to the facility, something the Competition has stopped. In a deal with the county due the facility to cover most of the konsulenutgiftene if the Competition authority chose to stop the purchase.
the County sold recently holding their supply-reiaren Per Sævik from Sunnmøre.
Would reengasjere konsulentane
Wiersholm and DHT Corporativ Services helped the Sogn and Fjordane county in 2011 in connection with the current eigarprosessen in Fjord1. This is the view used as the reasoning for selecting just these companies also in 2014.
In an e-mail from the legal chief Svein Hågård in the county to NRK dated 3. February in the year he writes among other things, the following: “Wiersholm and the DHT felt so good to sakskomplekset from before and it was therefore desirable for the county to continue to use these konsulentane”.
tight-lipped fylkesrådmenn
Fylkesrådmann Tore Eriksen is tight-lipped when NRK confronts him with the matter.
Fylkesrådmann Tore Eriksen wish not to answer on why the law firm Wiersholm was leigd in to find out about consulting in Fjord1-the suit had to be out on the anbod. Wiersholm was the mission after that the company even stated that konkurranseutsetjing was unnecessary.
Photo: Bård Siem / NRK
Why was Wiersholm leigd in to find out if one should put the contract out on the anbod?
– This concern I will take up in connection with kontrollutvalet say treatment of the issue, he says.
in the Past you have been open on that the county asked Wiersholm for advice and that you supported you on this conclusion. Why will you not do the same now?
the Question of whether we have followed the laws I will care for me, but when kontrollutvalet have taken the matter lies she there. Therefore I will answer kontrollutvalet first, he says.
DHT Corporative Services want not to comment on the suit. Neither Wiersholm want to comment on the suit.
No comments:
Post a Comment