This meant the police were “unlikely” – TV 2

More than four months after the murder of Monika Sviglinskaja claimed police that “there was both unlikely and illogical” that someone had broken into the apartment using the hole in the glass door.

This was Monika’s mother, Kristina Sviglinskaja, told in interviews shortly before the investigation was completed.

the picture above shows that this was a totally false accusation, and that it was quite possible for a killer to take in through the broken pane .

Recently came indictment against Kristina’s ex-boyfriend, a 33 year old Lithuanian citizen.

Where it is evident that police now believe the accused broke a window in the front door to take care in, presumably using the ax.

Then he attached a belt around her neck and tightened and / or hung her up in a doorknob so that she was strangled.

More gold jewelry was stolen from the apartment in Sund Hordaland this day, 14th november 2011.

– I feel that the gold was gone was one of the conditions in which the police really thought that there was no gold away. They did not believe in Kristina, says counsel Stig Nilsen to TV2.

This is demonstrated in the documentary “Monika’s Mom” ​​shown in Document 2 Wednesday at 9:40 p.m..

shelved

Monika was found dead with a belt around his neck. Suitcases were detected DNA from herself and from an unknown person. It was strewn spices on the floor in the kitchen and in the living room.

Six phone calls in five minutes went by Monika mobile to her mother that morning she was killed. Her cell phone is never found.

15. August 2012 the police decided to drop the case that no criminal. It was police inspector Sidsel Isachsen who took the final decision.

– Was seen as an immigrant

The police concluded that Monika died as a result of self-inflicted injury.

– Everything was good at the beginning, with interviews and explanations. But gradually I felt that I was seen as an immigrant. It was a bit like that “you can not speak the language, we are doing everything that can be done here.” When they started talking that way, I began to doubt and think that it is something that is not good here. This is unlikely to succeed. I knew it in your heart, says Kristina Sviglinskaja to TV2.

– A very clear lie

In a memo wrote NCIS “The mobile phone of the deceased away. Rejects the theory of suicide. “

Bergen police chose to ignore this note.

– A very clear lie is that they said they have had assistance from NCIS, both technical and tactical. It turned out that it was not the case. They had technical assistance, but never tactically. NCIS has since said that they were waiting for a request for tactical assistance, but it never came, says Stig Nilsen.

– Another lie

After Monika death received Kristina one Facebook message from an unknown person who said he knew who killed Monika.

The person demanded money to give her information. Kristina suspects quickly that this was the ex-girlfriend of her.

In the message tells the sender in detail what valuables were stolen the day Monika died, including a “Lady Million” perfume. The so-called Facebook track contains information that only the police and Kristina knew.

Still, certain prosecutors Monika case that they should not pursue this track.

– Another lie was that Facebook track would be followed up, and that we would get feedback when answer existed. It was never followed up. It was taken an active decision not to follow it up, says Nilsen.

Tried to convince her mother

Man charged with murder of Monika

Document 2 has met the two investigators who interrogated Kristina. They do not want to come forward. Both tried to convince Kristina that her daughter probably took his own life.

Investigators say “they felt used to tell that the case would be dismissed and that it was uncomfortable not being able to give Kristina clear answers» .

Took care of DNA material

Both denied that they lied during the interrogation.

– I only hope that they are even convinced that what they said was actually correct. That they deliberately set and produced false information, says Nilsen.

One investigator doubted so much what they said Kristina, that he chose to take care of DNA material from the accused.

DNA which by law should have been removed and destroyed, but which later proved to be important evidence in the case.

“Had recording of the murder”

police believe the accused in connection with burglary and murder stole Monika cellphone and Kristina’s gold jewelry and perfume.

They also believe that the defendant tried to extort Kristina for a five-digit amounts over several threatening e-mails as well as the aforementioned Facebook message.

the defendant shall in addition have called Kristina and told that he knew who killed her daughter, and stated that he could obtain an audio recording of murder against a larger dollar amount, according to the indictment.