Wednesday 13 May argues Gunnar Staalesen that when Bordeaux has managed to achieve a path through his verdsarvfreda center should add the unknown Bergen say rail over Bryggen.
Rather not I see that consideration for historic cultural values stand in the way of a path over Bryggen. But I will pointed other adverse argument that banana still not should go there.
READ ALSO: LRT over Bryggen? See Bordeaux!
1. Court with frequent departures over Bryggen will tvinga traffic to other streets, particularly the traffic moved to Øvregaten. So it is the wanted ein Skansekaia Tunnel to spare Øvregaten.
Well and good for downtown, but Skansekaia tunnel will increased traffic in Skuteviken and Inner Sandviken. And in particular certain banana goes in Sjøgaten will upper parts of Sandviksveien get considerably, more strain.
In addition, ein Skansekaia Tunnel stimulating bilkøyring between Bystasjonen and Inner Sandviken, something that is across the overriding political objective.
The pier is only parts usable omkøyringsveg When an ran Fløyfjell Tunnel is Stengd. Sconce tunnel can take over the role, but because Skansekaia tunnel normally more harm than good, it should not preventing and Bryggen should therefore remain banefri.
2. Pathways option over Bryggen will crossed 3.7m over Bontelabotunnelen, thus stengja to kunna passable by train between Nygårdstangen and Bontelabo.
It has a low strength creatively to building ein rail pathways involving to stengja dockable court pathways. No can trench in Inner Sandbrogaten alternatively lowered so that the core level with Bontelabosporet, and then go on Koengen and Skuteviken.
But there will increased risk of having to dig in valuable cultural layers, and at best it will directly how involve several years of penalties.
No also option with tunnel into Peter Motzfeldtsgate their side of our creative ; it is dyrare and covered center slightly poorer than the alternative of Market and Bryggen.
And the risk to lower the reason the lake is larger than the trench runs in the day – albeit “highly unlikely” that the tunnel options under consideration will lowering the reason the lake, concludes Norconsult in his paper “Supplementary hydrogeological assessments in Sandbrogaten and Vågsbunnen . “
Fine-second option for banana through / behind center? Pathways onto Nordnes and bridge over the harbor will vera an excellent urban development, but the disadvantages are that the bridge will warrant making there is much more difficult to take in and out of the inner harbor basin.
Such a bridge must kunna be opened, but opened and stengja it takes at least 15 minutes have ein representative EiT firm that has designed such bridges, fortald me.
The light rail on a ferry across the harbor will samanlikning vera Much billegare and better, even if it involves at least two minutes extra travel time.
Eg has ish thought about banana can go about Inner Vågsbunnen and tunnel into Upper Korskirkeallmenningen. Tunnel into Upper Korskirkeallmenningen think I at least have EiT tryggare val than the Vetrlidsallmenningen or Finnegårdsgaten.
Upper Cross Church Almenningen is added to the terrain rise was, not on filling transclusions as for example Vetrlidsallmenningen, and fewer people are able to walk there.
And a light rail in Inner Vågsbunnen might help subsides Depression of reason lake, for the aforementioned memorandum on hydrogeology lasted it pointed at the pump sumps in the basement as an also probably the main reason for the SNØGG lowering rate in the area.
wenn these Kjella rob that without pump sumps will vera humid because of the lake, you då perhaps verta necessary.
And my pathways proposals that involve the demolition of, among other quarter Kong Oscars gate / Skostredet / Savings Banks Street / Lower Cross Church Almenningen, might vera the action speeds up rehabilitation of Vågsbunnen.
The new proposals as this entails just enough to postpone the decision-making put an extra gong. But mediocre solutions for overall infrastructure needs me slita with at least a hundred years.
If so, then it must vera better navigable light rail solutions without side effects from such in particular Bryggen option highly regarded.
No comments:
Post a Comment