Cappelen in his defense: Think Jensen knew about hasjbutikken – VG

the OSLO district COURT (VG) The former politilederen Eirik Jensen (59) blånekter to have known of the hasjbutikken to narkobaronen Gjermund Cappelen (50). A police report from the 2001 cast doubt on this assertion.

It believes narkobaronens defender, Benedict de Vibe.

When the criminal case against the former politilederen and hasjbaronen continued in the Oslo district court on Monday, was put forward documents from politietterforskninger in 2000 and 2001.

17. april 2000: Jensen caught a man in Asker and Bærum, which was in the possession of one gram of heroin. The man was put in custody at Ila prison and sought out by Jensen and a colleague in the course of varetektperioden.

— he Gave you the information about Cappelen? asked the Vibe.

No, replied Jensen.

DIRECT: Get the latest new from right here.

Claim Jensen received information about Cappelen in 2001

2. august 2001: The same man was arrested again by Jensen. In a police report arising there under the title “Issues” that the person has given information about a murder and Gjermund Thorud, who later changed last name to Cappelen.

INDICTED: The former politilederen Eirik Jensen (59) refuses straffskyld for contribution to the hasjinnførsler to Norway and gross corruption.

Photo: Tore Kristiansen

—I do not remember that he was mentioned in the case. You (journ.anm. lawyer Benedict de Vibe) on the assumption that there is something exciting he has communicated, explained Jensen.

— But he may well have given you the information about Cappelen and drug trafficking? asked the Vibe.

— It is not to talk about drug trafficking, the black, Jensen.

Hasjbaronenes defender drilled further with questions related to the the current report, and illuminated for Jensen that his colleague who was in the meeting with the man on the Isa in 2000, has explained themselves for Spesialenheten for police matters.

Jensen claims he does not have read this interrogation, but thought it was brilliant that his colleague has been in questioning since it will clear up the questions.

Jensen: Helped the informant with a drug abuse problem

But what if it was drug trafficking this was about? continued the Vibe.

Then it would have been written a note and added to the system, said Jensen.

But it may have been something other than drugs?

— Yes, it is. I helped this man on a rusklinikk, the same as I had done with Cappelen earlier, replied the early politilederen.

Jensen is clear on the fact that he never has known to cappelen in his hasjforretning before he was apprehended at 19. December 2013.

— Cappelen has had the expertise that we have employed by us. I have never heard from anyone else about his business, explained Jensen, who thinks it is obvious that Cappelen has introduced hashish to Norway after it happened for just over three years ago.

Spanet on hasjbaronen alone

In another police report from 12. December 2000 it’s revealed that Jensen got information from the police in Denmark that a Danish citizen was on his way to Norway by plane. The current man was one of cappelen in his partners, according to the defence counsel.

Jensen should have been alone during the spaningen against the Danish statsborgeren when he met just Cappelen at the restaurant Fridays in Oslo city centre.

In the report it says that Jensen lost “objects” in the dense traffic after the meeting.

— How was the observation handed over to the Danish police? asked the Vibe.

— I do not remember how it was stated, the black, Jensen.

But the report is stamped with the logo of the Norwegian police and includes the well really Cappelen?

Mhm… black Jensen short.

— You reviews Cappelen as the source, and write a report about him as a suspicious person, then?

— Yes, said Morrison.

Many questions

Hasjbaronens defender drilled further in on Jensen shared some of the information to your colleagues in the Norwegian police, but that he remembered nothing about.

There was a meeting. What happened next I do not know. It was a suspicious action, and since I wrote the report as well that I’m not holding the hand over some. I wrote a report. It was a choice I made, whether it was right or wrong not to go ahead, I won’t take a position on, ” explained Jensen.

The Vibe illuminated Jensen that he at this time knew that Cappelen had previously been linked to serious drug offences. Defence counsel wondered whether he ever confronted the Cappelen with the meeting with the Danish man.

— No, the Vibe. If we had received new information from Denmark, we could have created the case in Norway, the black, Jensen.

— You could well have said to Cappelen that you keep well not with this anymore?

What could I have done, said Jensen.