Friday, August 14, 2015

- Not as easy to be against the man before was for – Moss Avis

In the project where one currently is studying the impacts of a new municipal regional structure, the conclusions obtained local politicians to raise eyebrows.

– There is much to surprise, says Jarle Tranøy, Labour’s ordførerkandidat in Råde.



On operation

– Aller most surprising position, he says referring to the FRP that are no longer for a reform which they helped to lay the premises. And Right are surprisingly passive, he analyzes.

In the so-called Bruknapp report concludes that the moss region municipalities are relatively homogeneous, it says in conclusion, and one sees the region as a whole believed that the four municipalities adds current service provision and the financial soundness well facilitate building a strong Moss Region Municipality. It is the project manager Arne Bruknapp as commissioned by the region’s municipalities closer look at the consequences if a municipality merging and premises before the same.

ALSO READ: How will NHO that Norway map should look like

Analysis

The note points out Bruknapp that includes an analysis of service provision and financial solvency in the municipalities that will provide content for the first and third theme mentioned above, ie “Good and equal Services il citizens “and” Sustainable and economically robust municipalities. ” The analysis will cover both the zero option, moss region-municipality as the main option and the additional options that are adopted investigated. In its final report, the contents of this analysis to be released into the presentation of the various options to outline proposes.



Much good

In the county governor workbook is selected eight indicators within service areas nursery, health, nursing and care, social services and building to measure the capacity of municipal services:

– We have highlighted how good score four municipalities have on the individual indicator with shades of brown, with the darkest color on a good score and lit color of poor score. We see that the eight indicators, only one of those who follow the hypothesis, the best score for Moss and then falling profit for Rygge, Råde and Våler.

READ ALSO: Våler split down the middle

scores

In the report you can read that in “share of seats in private in nursing and care institutions”, have all four municipalities highscore 100 percent. For the seven other indicators have Våler and Moss best score of three indicators each. Våler scored best in “man-years of psychiatric nurses,” “Place the institution” and “Processing time building matters.” Moss scored best in “Physician FTEs”, “Physiotherapy FTEs” and “Man-years in social service.” Advise scored best in “Kindergarten coverage.”

Looking at the average score going municipalities very evenly, with Våler that best with 2.1, 2.2 and Moss Rygge and Råde 2.3.

For the four Moss Region municipalities we can out of the current situation thus did not confirm the hypothesis that the ability to deliver capacity improves with the size of the municipality. A possible explanation could be that the indicators above primarily concerns the more extensive service offerings and not the more specialized as smaller municipalities may have challenges to meet.

Good together

In comparison to other municipalities / county / country score Moss gathered capacity indicators:

better than or equal to Fredrikstad on 5 of 8 indicators

– better than Sarpsborg on 5 of 8 indicators

– better than or equal to Østfold municipalities gathered in 6 of 8 indicators

– better than country on 4 of 8 indicators

ALSO READ : Rygge is split down the middle

Not everything spick and span

For three indicators – “Physician FTEs,” “private rooms” and “building matters” – has Moss outperform all four references. On an indicator, “institutional per 80 years and older” have Moss weaker score than four references.

On this basis, we can conclude that Moss region overall has a capacity of its services at present such a majority of the indicators are equal to or better than the references.

They are selected six indicators to measure quality / expertise in municipal services. The indicators relate to service areas kindergarten, primary health, nursing and care and child care, and are shown in the table below.

– The report we can conclude that Våler might struggle when it comes to future economic resilience while Advise surprisingly enough come away with this.

Substantially

There are four elements in particular be considered when future now be reconsidered.

Next the economic robustness has it in this part of the report has been submitted away at the equivalent services.

Tranøy has previously made no secret that he is ready for reform, and that he is in favor of the report and investigation work now in progress.

Plank Town

– In general, I am positive that municipalities are merging and I perceive Moss region as relevant. But I also want us looking closely at Fredrikstad option. It is worth, say Tranøy.

Mayor René Rafshol says on its site that it is good that they allow themselves to take the time needed and that the debate now is good.

– But we must therefore have substantive elements to turn the table with if a reform must have meaning. And today the municipality has an offer that keeps the quality level requested. Moreover, one should not forget that even a merger has a cost. Not least when it comes to offsetting the wage differences today municipalities have. I have not found all the world’s arguments for reform after today’s meeting, he said.

sure

Nor deputy mayor Frederikke Stensrød (FRP) as a period flagged skepticism entire municipality merger project.

– In FRP, we have said that we should investigate and then make decisions. But in the current situation there is no tin for Advised part which in my opinion speaks for merging. The municipality does a good job, she says.

Stensrød points out that many of the report’s calculations are based on KOSTRA figures and therefore should form the basis for skepticism.

Later Bruknapp consider local democracy and community development. This is a basis for a new report.

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment