Sunday, November 2, 2014

Here are three favorites Road Administration – Rome Blad

Solution majority in Fet municipality governed wish – the so-called E- option – is not among them.

“After an initial screening process are the options A, C2 and D2 are the most appropriate.”

It writes a consulting company that works for Road Administration in a note Rome Blad read.

consultants who these days interviewing different local stakeholders to identify the social and economic impacts of the various options, mainly also only concerned to ask questions about these three, get RB lit. .

ALSO READ: Now this roundabout removed

– A missing

– It is unfortunate that this is coming out now, says project manager Edgar Sande in NPRA.

– It is wrong that the council should know about our provisional recommendations via backdoors. It will only start mass speculation among those who live in Bold.

According to Edgar Sande was not intended that the outside world should have access to the project group work.

– The preliminary recommendation has emerged because of a miss. A sub-consultant has used it in their work remotely. There is a preliminary recommendation and screening report is not one hundred percent finished, he points out.

Thus he opens for the possibility that they can add another one or two options in the final screening report, delivered Fet municipality at the end.

READ ALSO: Alerts breakdown Fetveien

Lover Road Administration’s game

But currently it is therefore likely that the Road Administration is not going to recommend that they are working on with the solution the Labour Progressive Party and the Liberal Party achieved a majority of the council.

– It is not NPRA that determine social development in Bold. It is the local democracy that does. I can promise them a good fight, leader in Bold Ap, Yngve Lofthus Teigen.

– I had the feeling that our alternative is Road Administration’s favorite. Nevertheless it is obviously disappointing if the signals are now coming true, he continues.

Lofthus Teigen says he will try to get the Bold FRP to influence government.

– But it is not difficult to defy scientific advice from the Road Administration?

– No, we have also technical arguments, including advice Road Administration even used in the feasibility study, he says.

– Do you not fear delays in development, if local politicians defy Road Administration recommendations?

– Can we get us Department of Transportation, may the road come even earlier than 2025 as it added up to the present, he replies.



– Can be disagreements

The final screening report shall contain three to five different solutions, based on the 17 crossing options feasibility study in 2012 launched.

Project Edgar Sande this answer to the question whether they can be push of a majority in the council has already gone for one option:

– This is a report which is academically justified. But the politicians should adopt. There are local democracy to decide. There may be a disagreement between expert recommendations and local political desires. We have seen previously in other development projects, responding Sande.



This will happen next

He explains further proceedings as follows:

– Straining report is part of the planning program where we recommend which options should be further investigated and the ways in which we think to investigate. After submission to the municipality, the planning program will be posted for public comment. Then the notes that come into being treated and evaluated. Finally, it is the council that makes decisions about which options should be further investigated, based on the Road Administration professional recommendations and the results of the consultation process. Having made the decision on which options should be further investigated, these will be subject to full impact assessment on many different topics. When impacts are identified and documented, and then in autumn 2015, NPRA make its recommendation about which option should be built. Then there will be a new municipal treatment, public consultation and community decisions.

RB was a commuter on problem road between Fetsund and Lillestrøm. See the queue minute by minute here:

… and compressed to less than minutes here:

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment