– The property tax is nevertheless not enough. I fear further centralization in Nesset and are afraid that it’s going proposal to wind up living community in Vistdal already at budget meeting in December, says Mellvin Steinsvoll (Ap).
The municipal council in Nesset adopted Thursday a decision in principle that says to introduce property tax on all permanent housing in the community from March 1 next year. Labor group would have a suggestion saying that the introduction of property tax assumes that current services for residents will be maintained as long as there is no basis for it. The proposal received nine votes and fell.
– This item is not worth anything. It is in the nature that we introduce property tax because revenues decline, said Mayor Hurlen.
The drive says the mayor that he and several of his perceived Labour Party voting as they in principle agree that it is introduced property tax .
Mellvin Steinsvoll mean residents will see that they have nothing left for it if they have to pay property taxes. The drive he says that the membership meeting of the Party was stressed that it was essential to get to this point as a decision.
– The consequence of not having to this point is that there are the fringes in the municipality matter will suffer when money is insufficient. For it they’re not going to do even if it is introduced property tax. I know that already they have been aerated tanks with the alderman to propose the closure of the living community in Vistdal already at the next budget meeting. I fear a further centralization, says Steinsvoll.
Several representatives expressed the view that it was with a heavy heart they voted for the property tax.
– It is sort of sad. We have a vast municipality but the working group has been at work does not come with suggestions enables us to avoid property tax without coming Robeks list. It is unfair to have to pay taxes for something you’ve built myself, but I do not think we have any other choice. All municipalities bordering us have introduced the tax, said Magne Bugge (H).
Centre Party Edmund Morewood meant nor that the property tax is something to cheer for. It was party trap Kari P. Øverås which submitted the proposal which was adopted by 12 votes to 9.
Meeting minutes of the case looks like this:
Note from the Chief Financial Officer dated 30.10.14 for clarification of paragraph 1 of the chief officer’s recommendation was distributed to meeting participants iPad 03.11. 2014.
Kari Petrine F. Øverås requested group meeting with the Centre Right and the Christian Democratic Party.
The Center promoted chief officer’s original proposal, the corrected paragraph 1
1. Nesset municipality property tax on all real properties throughout the municipality for property tax Act § 3 a. It conducted a general valuation of all taxable properties, including the previously assessed work and use, see. Esktl. § 8 A-3, second paragraph.
2. When printing property tax on homes use a tax asset base. All other properties are valued by an expert committee that determines the rates on the basis of proposals from “adding surveying men.”
3. As a competent tribunal, according to property tax law § 8, A-3, fourth paragraph, appointed the members of the current rate range for property: Håkon Nauste, Jan Red and Oddbjørg Øverås, with deputies.
4. Discharge comes from the year 2015.
Labor requested that it was done to try reconciliation.
The result of prøveavstemmingen were as follows:
Chairman’s proposal, with the corrected paragraph 1 got 6 votes.
The Centre Party’s proposal received 12 votes.
Labor requested group meeting.
It was made final vote on the proposals.
Chairman’s proposal, with the corrected paragraph 1 got 9 votes and fell.
The Centre Party’s proposal was adopted by 12 votes:
1. Nesset municipality property tax on all real properties throughout the municipality for property tax Act § 3 a. It conducted a general valuation of all taxable properties, including the previously assessed work and use, see. Esktl. § 8 A-3, second paragraph.
2. When printing property tax on homes use a tax asset base. All other properties are valued by an expert committee that determines the rates on the basis of proposals from “adding surveying men.”
3. As a competent tribunal, according to property tax law § 8, A-3, fourth paragraph, appointed the members of the current rate range for property: Håkon Nauste, Jan Red and Oddbjørg Øverås, with deputies.
4. Discharge comes from the year 2015.
No comments:
Post a Comment