The government talks down people polls in this forum and would rather that municipalities should use innbyggjar surveys. It can undermine our status and role as nationals.
A fundamental political question is: What weight should inhabitants their stance have in Decision whether the municipality deira shall slåast together with the neighboring municipality? In practice answering dei political parties on this by its position in two other questions: Should the Haldane folkerøysting and should folkerøysting replaced by innbyggjar investigation?
Here I’ll show how Minister Jan Tore Sanner and Conservative Party talks down people polls in this forum and striving for that municipalities instead should honor innbyggjar surveys. This could have far-reaching duck, and also probably unplanned, political consequences: Win Sanner and Conservative Party ahead, it will undermine our status and role as nationals.
In a press release February 25 2015 enter municipal ministry that they have received dedicate an innbyggjar inquiry into the use by municipal amalgamation. The Minister said: “This tool allows municipalities to hear what is important for citizens in the work of municipalities form. (…) Municipalities shape is about how we can create better social services, it is important to involve the citizens. ” And: “This will give local councils a better basis than is possible in a consultative referendum.”
To tek Sanner political moves: He states that innbyggjar investigation is you better tools at municipal amalgamation because the council with a survey get mapped inhabitants their views on welfare the services and get such also involved inhabitants. This is the way businesses use charting preferences of customer segment in market. Naturally it will be useful for the municipal council to vitamins kva inhabitants believes, but in our governance systems are inhabitants not customers. Dei Nor is it ein høyring instance via telephone. Dei’s nationals with rights and duties in EiT political community.
The crucial policy from Sanner say side lies in reducing or stengje of voters say force by transferring that power to others . The debt counties as Sanner and government will give a central role to “artistically challenged municipalities map again.” This also applies ordførarar and municipal representatives – those who Sanner no call on whether “to show leadership”; it is to say partly by avoiding continue at people polls in this forum and in part by circumventing the results of polls in this forum where voters have your voice against the minister’s way you want it.
Minister Sanner act in accordance with the Conservative Association that in a letter dated 04/02/2015 gave afford their ordførarar, group owner, councilor members and several about how they should argue when the local core people suggestions polls in this forum: “We have … drafted a memorandum that contains a number of good arguments for why local referendums on this issue do not have Noka good idea.” The memo is titled “Arguments against referendums in connection Municipalities shape.” Innbyggjar Surveys host strongly advised.
Valet between innbyggjar investigation and folkerøysting are particularly important because they build upon and promotes various notions and practices as regards democracy.
Innbyggjar Surveys host conducted as telephone interviews. Dei interview answers questions they are little prepared the cases on. Dei host ish “forces” to respond by select one of several response categories that are determined and devised by the researchers. Those who are interviewed will ish understood as being able to have unambiguous stance on goals for development of the municipality, as well as clear understanding of the target agent context.
How are they given abilities that hardly someone of us. The replies in response categories are as it interviewed the phone has declared himself most Einig or ueinig in, host summed together with the reply that the others interviewed have given. The sum of the answers to questions that are constructed and given this way, it’s like then inhabitants their position.
People Røyst Ingar has Rotate the classical view of politics and is far on veg ein contrast to questionnaires survey. As ein important premises for people polls in this forum Wasted the understanding of the human being both creates and get mein payment through personal experiences and by oppleving of and interaction with other human and deira activities.
The basis for using folkerøysting lie and a sense of how we can understand having political standpoint: Such stance will the comet out of thorough thinking and comet expressed in a political action or action-oriented debate. The replies to host given in telephone interview questions with closed answer categories made by others in advance will therefore lead to low soil as an expression of political opinion.
In a folkerøysting will ein gladly choose between two clear alternative, most often yes or no. They must meet in EiT’s voice local and must undertake valhandlinga in a trade-that asks shed about seriousness and responsibility. How is the participation in a folkerøysting more committed than be telephone interviewed. Through valkampen and the public debate that came with them are arguments and perceptions seen against each other. Standpoint being publicly tried. Nokre host verified and receive support. Others are faulted. Voters are more interested and host parties. Dei host nationals who takes political standpoint – individually and collectively.
Through the legislation, political practice and consolidation of the ein democratic culture is management scheme our institutionally anchored acting as a democracy. The municipalities are a part of the control scheme. Inhabitants in a commune are members of the local community (a) deira municipality encompassing. Both inhabitants which their communities are being made consequences of municipality governance systems.
In our governance systems is the EiT mistake to understand its inhabitants as a customer, and it is at best an expression of “democratic deficit “by the thinking that ein« involving citizens “in that innleigde meaningfulness measurement firms in telephone sets combines a selection nokre questions about welfare the services in the municipality. They are nationals – members of the municipality as a political community.
It is in this context that interpreting “and talked down” and actively OVA resistance people polls in this forum as well as to argue for replacing people polls in this forum with innbyggjar surveys based on telephone, is in particular clearly seen. How to host it clear what for values and interests Minister Sanner and Right downhill drag.
The controversy over municipal Reformation takes place on several fronts. The minister Sanner in the driver’s seat, the project has been a reform that organizes its inhabitants away from being able to use say power as nationals. Minister skuvar instead voted county governors and ordførarar that he will be danced by his music. The controversy on this front section debt Borgare say power and its right – nationals as a political institution.
No comments:
Post a Comment