Thursday, July 28, 2016

Add strategic plan pray burglar – Day

The host underlined that there must be close cooperation between the three, that they have to speak well of each other on the ground floor and will holding each other informed about the project and plans.

READ: Organizer for tougher times

the changes in a church “drives us also closer together,” it is stated. Dei will support each other in efforts kyrkjelyd planting, but stresses also that each INDIVIDUAL organization has freedom to work Purposeful and offensively.

This paper outlines six models for collaboration and gives an assessment:

1. Several assemblies in the same chapeau

Rating: This can work on larger chapel with Much activity where one has established assembly of a specified size for viewing.

2. A joint permanent assembly meeting where the responsibility for arranging meeting rotates between organizations. Collectives income goes to the organizer.

Review: The challenge is that ein not get the dynamics that are in a einskapleg Assembly.

3. A joint assembly meeting, but the responsibility for the meeting at a joint committee with members from the organization.

Review: This is ein model that can work in many locations.

4. Joint Assembly without attachment to someone of the organization

Review: It’s understandable that someone host weary from having to find their way in the organizational landscape when they feel that the community is working fine without affiliation. But meeting GUIDES frequently over time to tie into ein larger context. There are also preventive for conflicts.

5. Joint Assembly, adjoining several organizations

Review: It’s commendable to stand close together, but it occurs anyway challenges when the various organizations their structures and rules collide. The debt among other things approval of her appointment, economy model and spiritual supervision.

6. Joint Assembly control, link an organization

Ei joint Order of and the Assembly shall interconnectedness to the eine organization with rights and obligations. The other organization will be “meeting a partner.” All small groups can choose freely whether one wants to be a member of ein or both organizations.

Rating: This model host advised the note. He has a “long-term sustainability and can work well in many places.” The model takes also care that eins source has an organization as its heart-friendly and that there is room for small groups and Order of which have different attachment. It must create ein contract with Capitol a partner, in particular about the economy, it is stated.

READ ALSO: Want dialogue with home mission

Indremisjon Association’s Executive Committee handsama memorandum in March and underlined då that meeting must be free to choose the model out from the local situation.

the Norwegian Lutheran Mission in the note gained acceptance in the leadership meeting and Executive Board is informed, informs information owner Espen Ottosen. In Normisjon should note processed in the National Executive Committee in the autumn.

Professor Knut Tveitereid by NLA Høgskulen others, describes the situation of Worship organizations as a “strategic tangle.” He hosted not surprised that the three forms the s native or Eigne church communities regardless of the Norwegian Kyrkja, he said in EiT posts under ein research conference on chapeau changing at Ansgar Theological University College in June.

“Until now, organizations largely been self-centered in its strategy work. It has been about how they can meet community development, finding sensible ways of working, and position themselves theologically, “he said.

EDITORIAL: Front IMF General

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment