- May be a need to cut 40 man-years in Research | Fagpressenytt – FagPressenytt

The government has in fact asked a ekspertutvalg come with kuttforslag equivalent of 10 percent of the administrasjonsutgiftene their, i.e. more than 80 million. The research council has on its own initiative, examined how they can cut as much. In a note from the management/managing director Arvid Hallén, outlined a number of possible cuts.

the Proposals would among other things involve that the Research council must arrange fewer conferences and that they must collaborate less internationally. It may also be that in the future will cost money to apply for funding from the Research council of norway.

the Research council of norway is preparing for downsizing

Considering cutting 40 man-years

the Research council of norway had, by the end of last year 473 full-time employees.

In the note it says that it is estimated will be able to come to be a need to reduce the administration with 40 full-time employees. The goal is that the first to be cut on the use of hired personnel, and then by attrition. Be prepared to consider alternative measures if this proves not to be sufficient, it is called on.

To see the administration in the Research council of norway for themselves that they can cut 80 million:

meeting places and communication

What is the: Meetings, conferences, seminars and forskningskommunikasjon. Includes information for potential applicants, users of research, politicians and the general public. The research council of norway spent nok 116 million on this in 2015, but see for themselves that they can cut 30 million.

So they can save money: the Research council of norway can reduce content production by among other things simplifying the web sites of the basal research programmes, according to the note from the ceo. The research council of norway holds many events. Considering that there will always be a potential for reduced costs through better coordination and stricter prioritisation between the Council’s various meeting places. Another possible measure is to collect the participation fee at events that cover the catering.

Impact: the Research council of norway believes that the fewer channels, conferences and seminars will make them a less visible role in the result that the possibilities to be a foundation for forskningspolitikken is reduced. But an increased focus on digital meeting places will lead to that they can give people more equal services, regardless of geography.

Rådgiverfunksjonen

What is the: Statistics, studies, evaluations, strategies, input into the white papers, long-term plan for the research m.m. Dialogue with the private sector, the government and the research environment. The research council of norway used in the 2015 120 million on this, but see for themselves that it is possible to save 8 million to cut the number of man-years and 2.5 million to reduce the purchase of goods and services.

We must realize that Norway’s research council is an expensive and superfluous intermediaries.

So they can save money: the Research council of norway see for themselves that they can deliver such products less frequently than in the day. They also believe there is money to save on a further development of the tools they use in statistics and analysis, to introduce a more self-reporting and through increased digitization.

Impact: the Research council of norway think the cuts in advice could lead to that it loses legitimacy and becomes less relevant. The research council will not be in the same way could act as an independent advisor to governments, research institutions and businesses. Moreover, the f.ex. impaired mobilization of the business sector and the impaired mobilization of Horizon 2020 will be the result if the reduction in the input becomes too large. The ministries may be less satisfied with what we deliver and possibly find other actors for such advice, called it in the note.

International efforts

What is: Mobilizing communities to apply for research funding from the EUROPEAN union, international cooperation outside the EUROPEAN union, the emissaries of the Research council is to fund m.m. The research council can cut 5 million (3 million in the number of employees and 2 million to reduce the purchase of goods and services).

So they can save money: the Research council can prioritise more strictly which international venues they want to attend. The research council writes that in the greater degree can make demands to the effect from the arenas in which the Research council participates in and assess the use of modern methods in the f.ex. our advisory services linked to Horizon 2020.

When it comes to cooperation with countries outside Europe, fewer raises, more stringent assessment of the participation in the cooperation, standardization, digitization and merging of nodes be appropriate measures.

the Consequences: That the Uk prioritizes the harder what they will participate in, can lead to that the Research council of norway, and Norway is perceived as less cooperative and service minded, both out and at home, according to the Research council of norway. It can also lead to a loss of supply of clean national calls for proposals, which may have consequences for the environments which are not internationally oriented, they believe. But to digitize the advice lead to that the rcn’s services are better available for the users.

Finansieringsfunksjonen

What is the: Planegging and posting, application processing, contracts and project follow-up. These costs were on 275 million in 2015. According to the administration, it may be possible to reduce costs by 20 million.

the academic environments ensures quality, not the Research council of norway

So they can save money: the Administration sees two major development projects will provide the savings. In the project New r & D processes have been simplified, standardized and specialized. The research council of norway has among other things decided to centralize the technical and administrative tasks for all activities and programs. The project also proposes fewer positions, søknadstyper and assessment criteria, as well as simplified administrative procedures and reporting.

the Project Research 3.0 to develop a new programmodell with strong coordination of subjects and topics and more strategic program management. A long-term goal is to have fewer programs and activities. By using less resources on the management and development of the programs, have fewer calls for proposals and applications and economies of scale associated with meeting places and knowledge base, the Research council could cut costs and reduce the number of employees.

the Research council of norway are also working on a further standardization of what should be the normal use of resources related to programs and activities. Thus, one can easier detect deviations in the use of resources.

the Administration also says that it can be appropriate to change the prosjektoppfølgingen to users. It may be desirable to change the contracts so that the need for detailed follow-up and reporting can be reduced.

As the Forskerforum has written, believes the Research is that they get too many bad applications, and they use a lot of resources to process the applications they think should have been sent. To bring down the number of bad applications considering the karanteneordning, coordination of application deadlines and fee applications

Implications: the Research considers the consequences for the users in all will essentially be positive. The goal of a new programmodell is smoother and more predictable initiatives and calls for proposals, smoother ressursstrøm towards research, less micromanagement and more hensiktsmessigkoordinering. For the authorities, a new programmodell could be perceived as more strategic and dynamic, printer administration. They realize that it might be controversial to introduce measures to reduce the søknadsmengden. But done in a targeted way, so that it mainly affects the weakest the application, may nevertheless be perceived as legitimate in the academic communities and reduce you work relating to the søknadsskriving, they write.

Administrative services

What is: Accounting and financial management, ICT-services, staff management, security and emergency preparedness m.m. In 2015 had Research 74 man-years to these features. They spent 225 million, but expect to be able to save 15 million from 2018.

So they can save money: Research council jobs with digitization, among other things, they have introduced e-invoicing, mobile app for vouchers m.m. They believe they can save money by capturing and partially lay down his library, by laying down hustrykkeriet and by the fact that the house owner KLP takes over resepsjonstjenestene. From 2017 can Research use innkjøpskontoret to the Agency for public management and EGOVERNMENT. The research council expects this will make sure they get better prices by purchasing and spend less money on anbudsinnhenting.

Impact: the Research council of norway writes: Lower level of service and a reduced service offering internally. A coordination of services by a service centres, can provide a better user experience than today. When it comes to our reputation, a closure/reduction of the library can provide a negative signal effect for an expertise-based organisation like the Research council of norway.

the Research council of norway is considering to blacklist scientists

In this built at Lysaker in Oslo keeps the Norwegian research Council. They are the largest lessee. The research council of norway had, by the end of 2016 around 473 full-time employees. Now, they prepare on the cut. Photo: the Research council of norway

From an information meeting that the Research council held earlier in the year.

the Research program forth compliance website. The research council will save money by simplifying their websites.

Woman died of legemiddelforgiftning – NRK Vestfold – Local … – NRK

the Woman died in 2014 of overdosage of the drug Methotrexate. The drug used in the treatment of several cancers, psoriasis and arthritis.

the Treatment was stopped for a period of the Hospital in Vestfold when she should be treated for another chronic illness.

After the treatment, she was discharged to the nursing home in Re where she lived. Sykehuslegen gave when oral information to the relatives that the treatment with Methotrexate should start again. The relatives gave the message on to the nursing home.

communication failure was fatal

A nurse at the nursing home called the doctor and asked if the woman should be put on the drug again.

Superior confirmed it. At the nursing home perceived that the treatment should be “10 mg x 1″. The woman was, according to the daily given dosage for one whole week. This happened over an unknown period of time. Finally, she managed not to take medicine.

She got abdominal pain, diarrhea, blistering in the mouth and sårinfeksjon. The woman was put into the Hospital in Vestfold again, and died after a short time.

the autopsy showed that the cause of death was benmargssvikt as a result of malpractice with the Methotrexate.

According to the State board of health claims superior that it was given the correct dosage on the telephone, but that it was written incorrectly in the note to the nursing home.

Re nursing home violated the requirement of proper treatment

company manager for health and care in Re municipality, Ingerd Saasen Backe, says the incident is very regrettable and that they should not take oral doseringer.

– We should have checked more closely, and eventually called the doctor up once more.

In the aftermath has the nursing home been closed down. Today has Re Helsehus sykehjemstjenestene in the municipality. E-messages and a new quality system is introduced. The nursing home also has additional focus on pharmaceutical supervision and employee training.

Refses of the State board of health

the State board of health struck in December 2016 fixed that the Hospital in Vestfold has broken forsvarlighetskravet in spesialisthelsetjenesteloven.

Broke the law

the State board of health came to the following after a the supervision of the then Re nursing home and the Hospital in Vestfold.

• Re nursing home (now closed down, sykehjemstjenestene coordinated on Re helsehus, journ.anm.) has violated the requirement of proper treatment in accordance with Health and omsorgstjenestelovens § 4-1 and Interkontrollforskriftens § 4. State board of health ba Re municipality health and care about the to use the incident in a learning perspective so that similar incidents do not happen again.
• In December 2016 found the State board of health that the Hospital in Vestfold has broken forsvarlighetskravet in spesialisthelsetjenesteloven § 2-2 cf. internkontrollforskriften section 4.

They conclude that it was improper that the outpatient ordination happened only verbally, and that the dosage of Methotrexate was not unequivocal.

In tilsynsavgjørelsen it states: “the State board of health considering that the Hospital in Vestfold has acted recklessly by not ensuring that the patient and/or the nursing home got the correct prescribing of Methotrexate, where the nursing home had the responsibility to take the medication”.

Measures the Hospital in Vestfold has introduced

• Sykehusapoteket mark all packaging with Methotrexat with the warning: Dosed 1 time a week. Daily use can result in serious poisoning.
• Methotrexat should have ukedagsangivelse.
• All personnel who have rights to legemiddelhåndtering get a separate hole cards for høyrisikolegemidler.
• the Hospital introduced in the autumn of 2015 electronic reseptforordning in reseptmodulen. It should prevent feilmedisinering. In the module, it comes up alert on the particular circumstances of each medication.
• It is laid out information about prescribing and kurveføring of Methotrexat on the hospital intranet.

Although the hospital has introduced measures in the aftermath of the event (see information below), believes that helsetilsynet that it is not sufficient to ensure that similar incidents do not happen again.

Boss at the medical clinic at the Hospital in Vestfold, Jon Anders Takvam, sorry it has happened. He says the doctors at the clinic after having received information that they should be aware of the dosage.

So have sykehusapoteket, in consultation with us, introduced a particular labeling of the forpakningene, which clarifies weekly dosage.

the Hospital has also distributed kunnskapssenterets information about the safe use of the drug, and taken up the matter in legemiddelkomiteén at the hospital.

The research council is preparing for major cuts. But the bigwigs earn fat. – FagPressenytt

In a note to have the ceo Arvid Hallén and the administration outlined possible cuts for a total of over 80 million.Where does it say that it is estimated will be able to come to be a need to reduce the administration with 40 full-time employees. Furthermore, among other things, he proposed to lay down the Norwegian research council’s library, reduce the international business and arrange fewer conferences.

Read the background to the case here: the Research council of norway is preparing for downsizing

a Better salary than the prime minister and principals

But Research has still afford to keep themselves with generous remuneration. Arvid Hallén servant according to the Research, around 2.1 million a year, while when the direktørJohn-Arne Røttingen receive an annual salary of 1,95 million. Arvid Hallén and the five divisjonsdirektørene in the Research council of norway has on average an annual salary of 1,74 million, according to figures from the Research council of norway.

In a good epithet for you see what the directors have in the annual salary:

I think it is in excess. There is quite a lot more than what a member of parliament, state secretary or minister get, say, parliamentary political Marianne Aasen (Ap) in the ministry of education and forskningskomitéen.

We must realize that Norway’s research council is an expensive and superfluous intermediaries.

prime Minister Erna Solberg earned in 2015 1,57 million, according to skattelistene. She earned less than the bigwigs in the Research council of norway this year, on average, had an annual salary of 1,69 million. Education ms. Torbjørn Røe Isaksen, 1,15 million. The top officers of the Research council of norway is also better paid than most university – and høyskolerektorer. At the universities and the state university colleges, it was in 2015 only two principals, The Ole Petter Ottersen and Ntnu Gunnar Bovim, who earned more than snittlønnen to the rcn’s six top corporate executives.

Received a letter from the ministry of education

Marianne Aasen says:

– If we think in a slightly longer perspective, the tighter public budgets in Norway. Very large oil income is going to disappear. When must all turn on the krone, also senior managers in the public sector. We have been able to afford to it when we have had oljeøkonomien, but it is not sustainable over time to have as high wages.

the ministry of education has also been concerned about the wage levels. According to Morgenbladet sent to the ministry in 2013 a letter to the executive board that the salary levels for leaders is high. The ministry expects that the salary levels in the Research council of norway is coming closer to the salary levels in comparable state agencies. stated department head and the director.

When the next time should be added to the new ceo of the Research council of norway, prompting the ministry to be drawn into the determination of salary levels for the person, it was furthermore, according to Morgenbladet.

Chairman of the board of the Research council of norway:- Quite all right

I think the salary level is quite all right, ” says Henrik O. Madsen, chairman of the board of the Norwegian research council’s executive board.

” We compete for skilled people in the market. When we make every single appointment, we have to see his salary compared to the salary they have from before. When we interviewed candidates for the new ceo, I know that many had significantly higher wages than what we ended up with to offer. If we had offered a lower salary, would many have resigned, ” he says.

– Bigwigs earn more than the prime minister?

– Now you need to keep up with the comparison! You can find people in any department with a higher salary than her. We recruit from the private sector, from the public sector and institute sector – from all parts of Norway.

Managing director Arvid Hallén writes in a comment:

– Divisjonsdirektørene is recruited with a background including from the pharmaceuticals and the energy sector, and the salary level reflects this.

the Research council of norway is considering to blacklist scientists

In this built at Lysaker in Oslo keeps the Norwegian research Council. They are the largest lessee. The research council of norway had, by the end of 2016 around 473 full-time employees. Now, they prepare on the cut. Photo: the Research council of norway

In this built at Lysaker keeps the Research council of norway. Now, they prepare to cut the costs. Photo: the Research council of norway

at the Top f.v.: Anders Hanneborg (director Science): 1 748 000€. Fridtjof Fossum Unander (director of Energy): 1 721 000$ . Tove Karin Stølen (director Administration): 1 433 000€. The second row f.v.: Anne Kjersti Fahlvik (director Innovation): 1 847 000$ . Arvid Hallén (ceo): 2.1 million.

Woman died of legemiddelforgiftning – NRK

the Woman died in 2014 of overdosage of the drug Methotrexate. The drug used in the treatment of several cancers, psoriasis and arthritis.

the Treatment was stopped for a period of the Hospital in Vestfold when she should be treated for another chronic illness.

After the treatment, she was discharged to the nursing home in Re where she lived. Sykehuslegen gave when oral information to the relatives that the treatment with Methotrexate should start again. The relatives gave the message on to the nursing home.

communication failure was fatal

A nurse at the nursing home called the doctor and asked if the woman should be put on the drug again.

Superior confirmed it. At the nursing home perceived that the treatment should be “10 mg x 1″. The woman was, according to the daily given dosage for one whole week. This happened over an unknown period of time. Finally, she managed not to take medicine.

She got abdominal pain, diarrhea, blistering in the mouth and sårinfeksjon. The woman was put into the Hospital in Vestfold again, and died after a short time.

the autopsy showed that the cause of death was benmargssvikt as a result of malpractice with the Methotrexate.

According to the State board of health claims superior that it was given the correct dosage on the telephone, but that it was written incorrectly in the note to the nursing home.

Re nursing home violated the requirement of proper treatment

company manager for health and care in Re municipality, Ingerd Saasen Backe, says the incident is very regrettable and that they should not take oral doseringer.

– We should have checked more closely, and eventually called the doctor up once more.

In the aftermath has the nursing home been closed down. Today has Re Helsehus sykehjemstjenestene in the municipality. E-messages and a new quality system is introduced. The nursing home also has additional focus on pharmaceutical supervision and employee training.

Refses of the State board of health

the State board of health struck in December 2016 fixed that the Hospital in Vestfold has broken forsvarlighetskravet in spesialisthelsetjenesteloven.

Broke the law

the State board of health came to the following after a the supervision of the then Re nursing home and the Hospital in Vestfold.

• Re nursing home (now closed down, sykehjemstjenestene coordinated on Re helsehus, journ.anm.) has violated the requirement of proper treatment in accordance with Health and omsorgstjenestelovens § 4-1 and Interkontrollforskriftens § 4. State board of health ba Re municipality health and care about the to use the incident in a learning perspective so that similar incidents do not happen again.
• In December 2016 found the State board of health that the Hospital in Vestfold has broken forsvarlighetskravet in spesialisthelsetjenesteloven § 2-2 cf. internkontrollforskriften section 4.

They conclude that it was improper that the outpatient ordination happened only verbally, and that the dosage of Methotrexate was not unequivocal.

In tilsynsavgjørelsen it states: “the State board of health considering that the Hospital in Vestfold has acted recklessly by not ensuring that the patient and/or the nursing home got the correct prescribing of Methotrexate, where the nursing home had the responsibility to take the medication”.

Measures the Hospital in Vestfold has introduced

• Sykehusapoteket mark all packaging with Methotrexat with the warning: Dosed 1 time a week. Daily use can result in serious poisoning.
• Methotrexat should have ukedagsangivelse.
• All personnel who have rights to legemiddelhåndtering get a separate hole cards for høyrisikolegemidler.
• the Hospital introduced in the autumn of 2015 electronic reseptforordning in reseptmodulen. It should prevent feilmedisinering. In the module, it comes up alert on the particular circumstances of each medication.
• It is laid out information about prescribing and kurveføring of Methotrexat on the hospital intranet.

Although the hospital has introduced measures in the aftermath of the event (see information below), believes that helsetilsynet that it is not sufficient to ensure that similar incidents do not happen again.

Boss at the medical clinic at the Hospital in Vestfold, Jon Anders Takvam, sorry it has happened. He says the doctors at the clinic after having received information that they should be aware of the dosage.

So have sykehusapoteket, in consultation with us, introduced a particular labeling of the forpakningene, which clarifies weekly dosage.

the Hospital has also distributed kunnskapssenterets information about the safe use of the drug, and taken up the matter in legemiddelkomiteén at the hospital.

Router on the work with the Fornebubanen: – Unpredictable and irrational – Aftenposten

Earlier, it was said that Fornebubanen be able to be completed in 2021. Now it is more realistic that the first flight will be in 2024. The reasons for the delay are many.

Besides the funding, it has taken a long time to agree on who should be the builder. The question was assessed of two different community council, and ended with the creation of a new agency.

Also reguleringsplanen for the part of the path you want to go in Oslo, is far behind schedule. Aftenposten has reviewed the minutes of the meetings between the agency and the Router.

Difficult collaboration

They draw a picture of a sometimes difficult cooperation between the public-owned company and the agency. It makes the planning process drag out in time. The agency is going all the time with proposals for comprehensive solutions, while the Router attempts to limit the scope.

First 11. november last year sent Glass into the agency accepted as a complete planforslag. It is far after the original dates. Early in the process was hoped to deliver a complete proposal in June 2015. The deadline was shifted four times.

Slide constantly on deadline

the Discussions in progress in several months of time before there is agreement.

– There are a growing up thing which means that we must adjust the plan. This is a complex planning process, and it is natural that it comes up things along the way, but the way the interaction works, makes it very unpredictable and irrational, ” says utviklingsdirektør Hanne Bertnes Led in the Router.

– There has been a strange process

Early in the process were Routes agreed with the agency about limiting the project as much as possible, to be able to focus on the T-path. Along the way, experienced the Routes that they were treated as any other developer.

It is a strange process. We find it strange that we are treated like any other developer. When the two municipal companies will be working for the same political objectives, is it any wonder that we should throw the ball that way, ” says Led.

Plan and bygningsetaten say they have the same goals as the Router, but that the rules are the same for all.

Both the substantive and formal requirements for what a development plan shall include, apply to all. Such sets are treated equally. But we seek to find solutions to the community’s best together with the Routes, ” says Andreas Vaa Bermann, head of department for områdeutvikling in the Plan – and bygningsetaten.

1996: It shall be built light rail to Fornebu before release to homes and businesses, determines the government.

2003: Akershus county council adopts for the second time that it shall be built.

2007: Akershus county council adopts that are to be built, tram.

2011: Diamonds recommends that it should be built Underground.

2012: the counties of Akershus and Oslo are agreed to build the T-bane to the A-house and Fornebu with a mixture of state capital and borrowing.

2015: the Government promises to contribute 50% of the cost of Fornebubanen.

2015: Reguleringsplanen for the part of the path that should go in Bærum is ready.

2016: It is agreed Oslopakke 3 and money to Fornebubanen.

2016: There shall be created a separate agency, which should be the builder.

2023-2024: Planned completion.

PBE would have doom, but went reluctantly with the parklokk

One of the differences is about a transition from Vækerø T-station over the E18 to the seaside. The metro station will be located north of the highway.

In march of 2015, insisted the Plan – and bygningsetaten that there would be an underpass from the station, under the road to the seaside.

One underpass will be for long that many will use it, and since the closure of the E18 was out of the question, it would have to be even deeper and longer than suggested, pointed out the Routes.

Plan and bygningsetaten stood firmly on that they wanted to regulate a downfall. So did they also after that the Routes in may presented a note that showed the challenges.

“Green, attractive gangforbindelse”

First at the end of august 2015 accepts the agency that it should not be built to a downfall. But they put a new proposal on the table: It shall be built a parklokk over the E18, “a green lid, which provides an attractive gangforbindelse that crosses the E18 to the seaside”.

In October 2015 suggest Routes that one instead expands the sidewalk on a bridge that already exists. PBE stands on his own.

First, in February 2016, PBE on the claim. They do not require that there be prepared a completely alternative with parklokk, but that reguleringsplanen should open that there can be a lid in the future.

In the course of 11 months has a downfall with a generous width, has become a green and attractive parklokk, but in practice ended up as an extended sidewalk.

– Discussions around these solutions has gone in parallel with the rest of the planning of the Fornebubanen, but more of the required avklaringene to arrive at the final solution at Vækerø, could probably have happened faster. But this alone has not delayed the planning, ” says Bermann in the Plan – and bygningsetaten.

This is not the only proposal the agency has come up with, as the Routes have were on the.

Think they both should have been responsible

the Planning of the “Hoffsdiagonalen”, a road access under the railway line at Skøyen, which connects to the E18, have also been discussed. The problem is that the Norwegian national rail administration would come with an opposition, which could delay the project by several years.

It was a kjempediskusjon. Parklokket and especially Hoffsdiagonalen was difficult, ” says Led.

Several smaller discussions have also taken place, among other things, whether gatebredden in Hoffsveien, the opening of a stream or how in a hundepark riggområdet for the construction can be.

– What should be done to get faster progress?

– If we had been common responsible from day one, I think it would improved the process, ” says Led.

She doesn’t think Plan – and bygningsetaten want to trainers process, but they are not measured on how long they use before the Router has sent over the plan’s proposals.

the Clock to Plan and bygningsetaten begins to run when they have had a complete planforslag, thus they have unfortunately, the incentives to postpone the time when the measurement starts.

– It takes time to develop such a great work

– No, we do not have incentives to delay when the clock starts. It starts when the Router sends a complete planforslag, and then the proposals must be complete, ” says Vaa Bermann in the Plan – and bygningsetaten.

– We see all of the benefits of that Fornebubanen be realised quickly, he stresses.

He believes that the clarifications that for example Hoffsdiagonalen leads to that the time goes by, but that it is natural in such a process.

– It is difficult to do it differently. It is impossible to have any matters clarified in advance when starting a planprosess. I have never experienced that a planforslag done from day one.

He does not experience that the Plan – and bygningsetaten and Router are working against each other.

– This is a large and complex zoning for a kjempetiltak for Oslo and Bærum. In such a process do you go through the large grips and the detailed solutions for each location. It takes time to plan and develop such a large work.

– Natural that it takes a long time

research leader Aud Tennøy by the Institute of transport believes that it is natural that reguleringsarbeidet takes a long time for a project that Fornebubanen.

Such projects is giant. It is a long process where one cannot overskue everything from the start. There are large areas and many links, and it is important to get to good solutions when building banestruktur that creates barrièrer in the urban landscape, ” says Tennøy.

She emphasizes that she has not gone into reguleringsarbeidet for Fornebubanen, but says one must reckon with the fact that such projects take a long time.

– It is simply very large and complex projects, and it is the Plan – and bygningsetatens job to ensure that solutions are best for the city. But it is easy to see that the developer is frustrated.

Had to go because of søppelkaos:Get 75 000 to replace the job – the Newspaper.en

(Dagbladet): on Monday, went Pål A. Sommernes of which the director of the Renovasjonsetaten, after pressure from the Oslo city council.

I have no comments in connection with my retirement as director in Renovasjonsetaten beyond as stated in the posted press release from the Byrådsavdeling for Environment and Transport, said Paul A. Sommernes in a press release on the matter.

Now, the letter still ex-director of the veil.

Facing the Newspaper confirms now Sommernes that the lawsuit would not have been excluded if not Oslo municipality had been willing to pay him 75 000 to go.

I would consider to not enter into the agreement if I do not got this performance. If there had been a lawsuit, depending on what my employer would have decided, now says Sommernes in a text message to the Newspaper.

the Salary and study leave

the Newspaper has disclosed in the agreement between the Oslo city council and ex-director, which shows that Sommernes:

• Container director-the salary now that he starts in the new job at the Oslo city hall
• Should begin as a project manager in byrådsavdelingen for urban development. Duties are to “be continuous” with the Oslo city council
• Get right to paid study leave, with all expenses covered by the municipality
• Get paid 75 000 extra money in February to avoid a legal conflict

Pay for to drop litigation

Ex-the director is the face of the Newspaper clearly that he would not have accepted what he describes as a “one-sided endringsbeslutning” from the Oslo-byrådets page.

- Yes, I would considered legal action. This payout is the result of a specific negotiation situation where there is a kontraktsregulert solution, ” says Sommernes to the Newspaper.

I’m mainly proud of the proven results, the municipality of Oslo and Renovasjonsetaten has achieved in the 11 years I have been director of the agency, says Sommernes.

He take the opportunity to greet his old colleagues in the Newspaper:

“To my dear former employee, I want to say – stand on and hold out!”, type Sommernes in a text message to the Newspaper.

“Fratredelsesvederlag”

A note from Kommuneadvokaten in Oslo confirms ex-director’s version about why he got 75 000 in extra pay-outs:

“This amount is not associated with Sommernes’ wages, but must be regarded as an amount paid to get the employee in the meeting in connection with the efforts to find a solution on the fratredelsessituasjonen”.

The type Kommuneadvokaten in a note that the Newspaper has disclosed. Here it is stated further:

“It appears including the municipality by Kommuneadvokaten considers that it will be associated with a prosessrisiko if an amicable solution is not reached, and the case instead is a general litigation for the court”.

special adviser Monica sigurd’s son by byrådsavdelingen for environment and transport in Oslo, describes the 75 000 crowns as a “fratredelsesvederlag”:

- After dialogue with Sommernes was made a general evaluation where it was concluded that the municipality’s interests are best ensured by entering into an amicable agreement, and that it was reasonable to give Sommernes a fratredelsesvederlag.

Find even in Dagbladet map of søppelklager, which is now up to date until Monday, 9th. January:

TEXT 1: Garbage-director is called to meet at the town hall, but did not know what the case was about. Show more

TEXT 2: It gets garbage-the director know that the meeting’s theme was his own personalsak. Show more

Similar to Dagbladet on Facebook

Had to go because of søppelkaos:Get 75 000 to replace the job – the Newspaper.en

(Dagbladet): on Monday, went Pål A. Sommernes of which the director of the Renovasjonsetaten, after pressure from the Oslo city council.

I have no comments in connection with my retirement as director in Renovasjonsetaten beyond as stated in the posted press release from the Byrådsavdeling for Environment and Transport, said Paul A. Sommernes in a press release on the matter.

Now, the letter still ex-director of the veil.

Facing the Newspaper confirms now Sommernes that the lawsuit would not have been excluded if not Oslo municipality had been willing to pay him 75 000 to go.

I would consider to not enter into the agreement if I do not got this performance. If there had been a lawsuit, depending on what my employer would have decided, now says Sommernes in a text message to the Newspaper.

the Salary and study leave

the Newspaper has disclosed in the agreement between the Oslo city council and ex-director, which shows that Sommernes:

• Container director-the salary now that he starts in the new job at the Oslo city hall
• Should begin as a project manager in byrådsavdelingen for urban development. Duties are to “be continuous” with the Oslo city council
• Get right to paid study leave, with all expenses covered by the municipality
• Get paid 75 000 extra money in February to avoid a legal conflict

Pay for to drop litigation

Ex-the director is the face of the Newspaper clearly that he would not have accepted what he describes as a “one-sided endringsbeslutning” from the Oslo-byrådets page.

- Yes, I would considered legal action. This payout is the result of a specific negotiation situation where there is a kontraktsregulert solution, ” says Sommernes to the Newspaper.

I’m mainly proud of the proven results, the municipality of Oslo and Renovasjonsetaten has achieved in the 11 years I have been director of the agency, says Sommernes.

He take the opportunity to greet his old colleagues in the Newspaper:

“To my dear former employee, I want to say – stand on and hold out!”, type Sommernes in a text message to the Newspaper.

“Fratredelsesvederlag”

A note from Kommuneadvokaten in Oslo confirms ex-director’s version about why he got 75 000 in extra pay-outs:

“This amount is not associated with Sommernes’ wages, but must be regarded as an amount paid to get the employee in the meeting in connection with the efforts to find a solution on the fratredelsessituasjonen”.

The type Kommuneadvokaten in a note that the Newspaper has disclosed. Here it is stated further:

“It appears including the municipality by Kommuneadvokaten considers that it will be associated with a prosessrisiko if an amicable solution is not reached, and the case instead is a general litigation for the court”.

special adviser Monica sigurd’s son by byrådsavdelingen for environment and transport in Oslo, describes the 75 000 crowns as a “fratredelsesvederlag”:

- After dialogue with Sommernes was made a general evaluation where it was concluded that the municipality’s interests are best ensured by entering into an amicable agreement, and that it was reasonable to give Sommernes a fratredelsesvederlag.

Find even in Dagbladet map of søppelklager, which is now up to date until Monday, 9th. January:

TEXT 1: Garbage-director is called to meet at the town hall, but did not know what the case was about. Show more

TEXT 2: It gets garbage-the director know that the meeting’s theme was his own personalsak. Show more

Similar to Dagbladet on Facebook