Lausund have to pay 11 million in damages – Sunnmørsposten

Steinar Lausund and company FB AS is ordered to pay over 11 million to Your Living AS after the housing project Storfjord Allé was sold in 2012. Norconsult must pay 6.7 million because they vouched that the ground conditions were not preclude for planning permission.

Project: Storfjord Alle

it was in 2008 by Lausund purchased the undeveloped area on Wood Neset Alesund. At about 20 acres he planned to build townhouses, villas and flats for sale.

A total of 64 residential units, according to zoning.

Searched municipality

Via the holding company is Steinar Lausund (Chairman) together with his spouse owns all shares in FB Development (FBU).

In 2008, it submitted an application to Aalesund municipality to dig out of bog and replace it with rock masses. Busengdal Transport AS were engaged in the project.

In November, the municipality ready signal and permission for digging down to bedrock and mass replacement of 1 meter above the ground. It took lots of replacement throughout 2010 and the work ending in December was resumed in summer 2011.

doubted soil conditions

A clerk at the municipality expressed doubts as to whether the property was suitable for development because of excessive moisture in the ground.

Steinar Lausund discussed this with Busengdal, and the following was written to the presidency:

– We will debunk this assertion then we summer / fall of 2009 completed culvert trench from this area and even down to the next marshland. In this way, all water Depleted and we have replaced mass in substantially the entire area up to 6 meters high. The area will therefore perpetuity be a dry area with excellent qualities to build a residential neighborhood.

Basic interruption

A few days later it happened a reason violating property. Lausund explained in court that a smaller area where there had been mass replacement “daughter” one meter.

Lausund brought in a geotechnical assessment of ground conditions, and an expert was on inspection of Norconsult.

According Sunnmøre district Court was not expert unknown in the neighborhood.

a few years before, he had been involved in a shallow survey Norconsult had on the neighboring plot in west commissioned by Grønmyr kindergarten.

Myrlag

the expert wrote a note to the FBU that Norconsult after two inspections could ascertain that reason indeed been good along with the impression they had received for their own research on nursery site.

– the whole area was originally covered with a mighty myrlag which overlies a layer of clay with varying thickness. What that is under the clay layer, is not proven by Most Eins empty, but the kindergarten the lot we had indications that clay layer had a thickness of 2-5 meters with a thin layer of firmer masses just above the mountain.

Norconsult recommended control measurements. The results were worrisome, according to the judgment.

Sale construction project to Your Home

Ålesund municipality gave 2 July 2012 building permits for row of houses H (six linked houses) and row of houses G (four terraced houses) . Six new terraced houses received a building permit on December 3, 2012.

Construction work on G and H started in August 2012.

FBU and Lausund sold project Storfjord Alle to Your Living AS 20.6 million in November 2012.

in addition, paid Din Bolig AS roughly 7.5 million for costs incurred six homes.

News with the demolition of several houses

Closing Date was set for 1 December 2012. In september 2013 was row of houses H completed as frameworks.

20. September undertook Busengdal ramming ground right up to the houses. A few days later it was discovered large sentence damage to the two houses farthest north.

The situation was discussed and it was noted that the damage was so great that one could not rule out the demolition of several houses.

Your Living notified injury insurance . And eventually the company came with a claim against Lausund and FBU.

Lausund stated that they had dealt with the technical expertise and that Norconsult had “recovered” area. An expert from the insurance company was hired.

The conclusion was that the damage resulted sentence (see fact box) in building foundations. The insurance company rejected that Busengdal be held accountable.

fracture underground

Multiconsult was set to assess the damage. They concluded that the injuries had occurred as a consequence of the breach in the underground, most likely in stone embankment. The embankment was closed for almost heavy with too steep inclination.

Your Living AS ended up suing Busengdal, FB Development and Norconsult.

The reason sentence injuries were central during the trial. It was also revealed damage in spring 2015 at the foundations of houses F5 and F6 in the area.

According to the court was due to conditions in the area difficult. It will readily occur sentences by drainage channels out of the area.

– Thought he got the building site

Since clay layer is variable in thickness, so there may be skewed phrases pose challenges at homes.

the court concludes that the injuries during the first two houses are phrases in clay masses under stone embankment which the buildings stand on, possibly in combination with a smaller ground failure.

Sunnmøre District Court believes Din Bolig AS had reason to believe that they had bought a building site where the buildings could be put on compressed fillings when the sentences were done. As the case appeared to them, it was natural to conclude that subsidence measurements were performed as recommended in the paper of Norconsult.

Information Duty

Sunnmøre District Court refer to the information requirement for selling after dependent. Specifically, it means that the seller is responsible for ensuring that information is given to the buyer.

Sunnmøre District Court agrees with Your Home in the FBU be blamed for their failure to inform the development, and the need for several measurements Norconsult took up in 2011 and 12.

Lausund believed Norconsult had “recovered the area” but had claimed the verdict no explanation why Norconsult nevertheless recommended sentence measurements within an area that was “recovered” .

the court’s stance is that the FBU in Lausund acted with gross negligence when he was not informed about the “stated concerns relating to soil conditions”, it says in the judgment.

there is also recorded several basic violation of property in FBU’s ownership.

Norconsult judged because they faced authorities vouched that the ground conditions were not preclude that it could be granted building permission.

Lawyer Ole-Reinhart Notø assisted FB Development and Lausund in court. He tells Sunnmørsposten that it is too early to say whether they want to appeal the ruling.

– But it will not surprise me if that happens, says Notø.

Notø are aware that there were objections to the launching, when Lausund sold in 2012.

– at the time of sale, there was nothing wrong with the site, and Lausund acted in good faith, says Notø.

it had been him (sentences) two years earlier, but it had filled in and been promised that the sentences would decline. The building permit was issued, then the conditions for the problems ceased, believes Notø.

Six homes were listed, and there had been no problems around these. According to the lawyer is the core of the matter that Norconsult both had said that the sentences would decline, and that it was given the go-ahead.

– Lausund had no reason to believe that not things were okay.

– So who has not done his job here?

– If Norconsult was concerned problems with reason, then they should have said that “we give no declaration before it is made new measurements “. FBU has not acted wrongful believes Notø.

Disagree point

Lawyer Steffent Kvisler for Norconsult says that he has not yet been read the judgment carefully, but will come back to it.

Norconsult must pay 6.7 million in damages because they vouched that the ground conditions were not preclude a building permit.

– Norconsult disagrees with the judgment on that point. Further comments we have to come back to, say Kvisler.

The report from the audit of Meland municipality in 2016 – Board of Health

Summary

1. Introduction

2. Mention of the agency’s activities

3. Implementation

4. What audit encompassed

5. Findings

6. Assessment of the control system

7. Regulations

8. Document Stands

9. Participants at the audit

The supervision of Meland municipality 5th, 6th and 8th of April is part of the nationwide inspection of municipal health and care services in 2016.

We investigated whether the municipality by systematic management and leadership has facilitated and came with them that persons with developmental disabilities, 18 and older who live in eigen Housing, getting defensive medical health and care services.

Leader and adding emphasize that the users shall contribute by organizing and carrying out services and activities. With the exception of services for those who cage in bufellesskap, are the services were mainly provided ein for ein. Services are in particular vulnerable to planned absence of permanent personnel in the work team for each of the users.

leadership has self-identified follow needs and improvement area of ​​the services to developing impaired:

• several employees with graduate education

 

• improving the knowledge by adding the structured and targeted environmental

 

• Documentation

 

We do not allow us to conclude that the services being provided, is indefensible.

We fann deficiencies in managing with the services which means that there is a considerable risk of failure in the implementation of personal assistance and health care in the home.

By audit diaper analysis identified violations of requirements in legislation and regulations.

deviation is:

1. Systematic measures to ensure that adding has the necessary knowledge to safeguard assignments are inadequate.

 

2. Responsibility for different tasks is not sufficient clarified. The systematic efforts to develop and imple- ment routines and keep abreast of that they are renowned, been followed and eminently suitable, is insufficient.

 

The deadline for feedback on the introduction of measures to correct deviations is August 15, 2016.

Date 04/25/2016

Anne Grete Robøle
audit owner

Torill Vebenstad
accountant

governor of Hordaland has the authority to oversee the health and care services for supervision Act with health care service § 2.

the report is compiled by an audit of Meland municipality. Authority is a part of the countrywide supervision of health and care services in 2016.

The purpose of the audit is to assess whether the municipality by saying management (internal control) ensured that claims lovgjevinga being lived. Upon audit, we investigated

• what action the municipality has to uncover, correct and preventing breaches of legislation Within the dei inspection program encompassing

 

• the types of assistance are being followed up in practice and if necessary corrected

 

• if the measures are currently good enough to ensure that lovgjevinga are been followed

 

Authority diaper performed as system audit. A system audit being undertaken by examining documents, interviews and other investigations.

The report is about findings of supervision and therefore Inga comprehensive condition assessment of the work the municipality has made Within the dei regions that audit encompassed.

• Variance concerns that requirements imposed by or in accordance with law or regulation, not been met.

 

Rådmannen govern the services in line to the leader for home and the services department Head of services for mental dis- abilities. The services to mental dis- abilities, age 18 and older who live in eigen Housing, organized by permanent staff in work teams related to each user. Except bufellesskap are the services given ein for ein. Paper will have self-identified follow needs and improvement area of ​​the services to developing impaired:

• several employees with graduate education.

 
• improving the knowledge by adding the structured and targeted environmental work.

 
• Documentation.

 

The audit encompassed follow activities:
Notification supervision framework was sent on 3 February, 2016.

Pre-assessments diaper completed on 25 February 2016.
Answer the survey about drug handling nappy been received on March 18, 2016.

Opening Meeting diaper holding 5 April
Interview: 16 persons diaper interviewed.
conversations with up users diaper completed on 5 and 6 April.
sampling: Journal and brukarpermar, rotation schedule and roster Easter 2016 beskjedbok with more, see Chapter 8.
Final Meeting diaper holding 8 April.

Overview of the contestants at the audit, document that we fekk sent in advance and document what was examined during the audit, is given in Chapter 8.

We have examined whether the municipality by systematic management and leadership has facilitated, came with them and if necessary implements changes so that persons with developmental disabilities receive defense medical health and care services and the requirements of law and regulations are complied with.

the audit encompassed:

1. Implementation of personal assistance, restricted to:
   – Supervision and help to safeguard eigen care
   – Help for activation
   – Training in daglege gjeremål, personal care and eigen care

 

2. Health services in the home and available for medical examination and treatment, confining to:
   – Drug Handling, istandgjering and distribution
   – Follow-up after medical visits and follow-up to assess the necessary medical care from a doctor
   – Health care by acute condition
   – Commune medverknad the user core in contact with and is been followed to a GP or doctor in specialist health
   – Help during office visits to convey information that the doctor need to provide health care
   – dissemination of information from medical visits back to those who provide health services in the home of user.

 

In connection with each topic we examined also how the municipality has arranged for and varetek use cleaning right to information and medverknad. We investigated and whether the municipality requested police at an offer for recruiting staff.

The audit encompassed not services being provided by the use of coercion and force, practical assistance households, client-managed personal assistance, medical care at emergency and dental services. About GP and specialist health provides sound professional health care and on the family doctor conducts regular health of the users, were also not part of the audit.

Variance 1: Systematic measures to ensure that adding have the necessary knowledge to safeguard assignments are inadequate.

Deviation from: Regulation on internal Control in health care § 4 a and c, cf. Act on municipal health services § 3- 1, third paragraph, ref. § 4-1 letter c and d and § 4-2.

the discrepancy build upon follow:

• It’s not all employees who have been sufficient information and training about the condition and needs of the bracken source users can make, before they lasted set into rotation. It is stated that in several instances is set too short a time for training.

 
• It is not everyone who provides services for mental dis- abilities who have been trained in first aid for employment in home services.

 
• It’s not all primary contacts who know the tasks conferred primary contact, ref. Council font physician routine. The debt for example assignments in connection with the preparation and evaluation of the action plan and individual plans.

 
• There are different perceptions of what will be documented in the medical records

 

• It’s not all that familiar routines for reporting any deviation and in what cases it may be appropriate to report. Several states that there is underreporting.

 
• Random samples show that deviations debt drug handling is recorded in the patient record. It is unclear whether other anomalies that debt intermediation to user must also register with the journal or be reported in other ways.

 
• Employees who provide services to the users dei Sami, have not always necessary knowledge and common understanding of how the individual facilitator Inga of attraction to the user should be, for example, ADL training. Need for more training is frying up paper will.

 

Variance 2: Responsibility for different tasks is not sufficient clarified. The systematic efforts to develop and imple- ment routines and keep abreast of that they are renowned, been followed and eminently suitable, is insufficient.

Deviation from: Regulation on Internal Control in Health Care § 4 a, g and h and the law on municipal health services § 3-1 third paragraph, cf.. § 4-1 c and d and § 4-2.

the discrepancy build upon follow:

• it is not sufficient clarified and known sequences that look that there is consistency between decisions regarding health and care services and action plans. Seven out of 16 users can make decisions from 2013 or previously years.

 
• It is given various information about know who is responsible for developing, evaluating and updating action plans.

 
• The function system coordinator is not sufficient clarified.

 
• Goals and measures for the training of user is not clearly seen in action plans.

 
• It does not go forward of routine for journaling how training of user will / should be documented.

 
• sampling medical records showed that not all action plans are updated.

 
• There are big separators candidates in kva, each and how often it will be documented in the medical record. In some journals it is a long time between the note.

 
• sampling brukarpermar shows that not everyone is up to date.

 

There is often not enough time to evaluate and conclude on the working methods and measures are eminently suitable for achieving targets in the action plan, possibly about goals and or initiatives should be changed. The debt for example measures to tryggje, develop or maintain holding trained ADL functions. Planlagde meeting being canceled. It is reported to paper will that it is too long between joint meeting of some teams.

Individual plans are not updated. When the audit was six planar is in progress.

The lead opposition not routines for decision-making about, preparation, evaluation and updating of individual plans.

It is not enough just clarified how information should be conveyed back to services when parents / relatives have been followed user to doctor / specialist health.

Practices to document that the user has been given real medicine is being done in different ways depending on what personnel performing task. In summer event will be no documentation.

It is not enough just clarified what information from the services to the development inhibited to report fallen in line from branch owner to councilman.

leadership is aware of conditions here. Where corrective measures are put into effect, have they hitherto not had sufficient impact.

Leader and adding emphasize that the users will get contribute by facilitating and implementing services and various activities. With the exception of services for those who cage in bufellesskap, are the services provided ein for ein. We have not a basis for concluding that the services being provided, is indefensible. With Novera staffing are the services in particular vulnerable to planned absence of permanent personnel in the work team for each of the users.

Chief boards the services to developing impaired in line to the leader for home and the services department owner. By audit there uncovered pervasive deficiencies in the leadership and management of its activities which in our view increases the risk of failure in the services to persons with developmental disabilities. With sound resturants management assumes that there will arbeidd systematically to prevent and detect incidents where it has or can malfunction, correcting and preventing that same happens again. In connection with the paper will its review of resturants and management system, it is insufficiently evaluated on practices and routines are well enough eminently suitable to safeguard its users their needs and comply with requirements in the health and omsorgslovgjevinga.

• law of 30 March 1984 no. 15 supervision of health and care services

 

• The Act of 24 June 2011 on the municipal health care

 

• The Act of 2 July 1999. 63 on patient and user rights

 

• The Act of 2 July 1999 no. 64 relating to health m.v.

 
• The Act of 10 February 1967 relating to procedure in cases concerning public

 

• Regulation of 21 December 2000 no. 1385 relating to patient

 

• Regulation of 20 December 2002 no. 1731 on internal control in health and care services

 

• Regulation of 27 June 2003 nr.792 of quality in nursing and care

 

• Regulation of 3 April 2008 no. 320 on medication management for businesses and personnel providing health care

 

• Regulation of 16 December 2012 No.. 1256 on habilitation and rehabilitation, individual plans and coordinator

 

INFORMATION awards received from Meland Municipality:

E letter 1st March 2016 enclosed

• Organization Chart

 

• Detailed organizational charts Meland home teneste

 

• Name of owner and others in staff functions – services for the handicapped

 

• Information about bufellesskap and Service capitals

 

• Goals and Strategic Plan 2016 – 2019 for Meland home occupational and Meland nursing

 

• Meland home teneste – subdelegasjon per 12.16.14

 

• Subdelegasjon coordinator – sakshandsamar

 

• Procedural Routine by omgjering of positions

 

• Strategy Document for recruitment

 

• Competence Plan for Meland municipality – action plans for eins source occupational area in 2016

 

• Examples of omgjering of heimehjelp position to vernepleiarheimel

 

• Examples of omgjering of Health postures to environmental therapist position

 

• Examples of omgjering of heimehjelp position on health postures

 

• Competence Plan for Meland municipality 2012 – 2015

 

• Procedure – information to appointments

 

• Checklist – training of new appointments in your home The service

 

• Domination training plan – users with disabilities

 

• Checklist for training

 

• Information for new appointments

 

• Supervisor iplos – registration of information in the connection with decisions about renting

 

• Mapping Form – user to move to eigen Housing

 

• Procedure for case processing in home The service

 

• Procedure primary contact

 

• Attachments – procedure primary contact – deepening users with disabilities

 

• Template for meeting structure

 

• Overview of meetings for employees in home services that work with persons with disabilities

 

• Procedure – patient documentation and report

 

• Deviation Form

 

• Rosters

 

• Week Planar

 

• Procedure for drug manageability in caregiving

 

• Checklist practical training

 

• Contract Form – delegated greyhound drug manageability

 

• Procedure – receiving patients by hospitals residence

 

• Email notification procedure between Plomer and health care businesses

 

• Individual plan – SAMPRO

 

• Note – liability groups per March 2016

 

• Results of the User Survey care 2014

 

Unknown public, cf. Offline a. § 13 cf. PAA. § 13:
administrative work and decision on the allocation of services

Sampling

• 16 patient

 

• Eight brukarpermar

 

• Reported deviations from 1 January 2016

 

• Minutes from the meeting of the work team, team meeting in bufellesskap and staff meeting

 

• Rosters Easter weekend and overview actually staffing at Easter 2016

 

• Beskjedbok

 

• Work List

 

• Receipt Lists capable made and distributed medicine

 

• Individual plans

 

Document what was submitted

• Eight brukarpermar

 

• Reported deviations from 1 January 2016

 

• Minutes from the meeting of the work team, team meeting in bufellesskap and staff meeting

 

• Rosters Easter weekend and overview actually staffing at Easter 2016

 

• Beskjedbok

 

• Work List

 

• Receipt Lists capable made and distributed medicine

 

• Individual plans

 

• Job description coordinator for the handicapped, 20 March 2002

 

• Proposal for mandate – functional responsibility for coordinating unit in Meland municipality

 

• Overview of individual plans created in SAMPRO

 

• Summary of primary contacts for mental dis- abilities who enter for the course of coordinator and individual plan

 

Correspondence between Meland municipality and governor of Hordaland :

• Notification of Supervision, letter of 3 February 2016 from governor of Hordaland

 

• E-letter with attachments from Meland municipality 11. February 2016 about know who’s municipal contact

 

• E-letter with attachments from Meland municipality 15. February 2016 about sequences as contestants on preliminary meeting

 

• E-letter with attachments from governor of Hordaland on 26 February 2016 survey of drug handling

 

• E-letter with attachments from Meland Municipality 1st March 2016, documentation which we had requested

 

• E-letter with attachments from Meland municipality on 8 March 2016 primary contacts in bufellesskap

 

• E-letter with attachments from governor of Hordaland 9th March 2016, the transmission of the program

 

• E-letter with attachments from Meland municipality on 18 March 2016 in response to surveys of drug handling

 

• E-letter with attachments from governor of Hordaland 18 March 2016, the transmission of corrected program

 

• E-letter with attachments from governor of Hordaland 30 March 2016, the transmission of the program

 

Other information

• E-letters from local branches owner in Norwegian Order of development inhibited about tenestetilbodet in Meland municipality.

 

The table below provides an overview of the participants on opening up meeting and final meeting, and over what people who nappy interviewed.

 

 


 
 

 

 
 
 


 
 

 

 
 
 


 
 

 

 
 
 


 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
 
 


 
 

 

 
 
 


 
 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 

 

 


 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 

 

 
 
 


 
 

 

 

 

 

Participants at the audit

Name	Function / position	Pre-assessments	Opening Meeting	Interview	End Meeting
Monica Agledal	Social educators		X	X	X
Anne Marit Andresen	Hjelpepleier		X	X	X
Rannveig Vats Helle Bovim	Coordinator for the handicapped		X	X	X
Marianne Bratshaug	Social educators		X	X
Signe E. H. Carlsen	carer		X	X
Matilde Bastesen Dale	Environmental Work			X
Helene Hammer	Health Work			X
May Linn Hvedding Hansen	Environmental Work			X
Ingvild Hjelmtveit	Chief		X	X	X
Bjorg Haaland	Heimehjelp		X	X	X
Christel Knudsen	Social educators			X
Josefine Kristoffersen	Social educators			X
Helge Kvam	Adviser	X	X		X
Britt Romarheim	Leader, heim residues residues	X	X	X	X
Nina Till Fjord	Department Leader	X	X	X	X
Janne Vinnes	Social educators		X	X	X
Kari Wellbrock	Førskulelærar			X

From the County attended:
Torill Vebenstad, Senior Adviser
Oliver Moldestad, Adviser
Arne Erstad, Senior Adviser
Anne Grete Robøle, section owner

Go to top

The report from the audit of Meland municipality in 2016 – Board of Health

Summary

1. Introduction

2. Mention of the agency’s activities

3. Implementation

4. What audit encompassed

5. Findings

6. Assessment of the control system

7. Regulations

8. Document Stands

9. Participants at the audit

The supervision of Meland municipality 5th, 6th and 8th of April is part of the nationwide inspection of municipal health and care services in 2016.

We investigated whether the municipality by systematic management and leadership has facilitated and came with them that persons with developmental disabilities, 18 and older who live in eigen Housing, getting defensive medical health and care services.

Leader and adding emphasize that the users shall contribute by organizing and carrying out services and activities. With the exception of services for those who cage in bufellesskap, are the services were mainly provided ein for ein. Services are in particular vulnerable to planned absence of permanent personnel in the work team for each of the users.

leadership has self-identified follow needs and improvement area of ​​the services to developing impaired:

• several employees with graduate education

 

• improving the knowledge by adding the structured and targeted environmental

 

• Documentation

 

We do not allow us to conclude that the services being provided, is indefensible.

We fann deficiencies in managing with the services which means that there is a considerable risk of failure in the implementation of personal assistance and health care in the home.

By audit diaper analysis identified violations of requirements in legislation and regulations.

deviation is:

1. Systematic measures to ensure that adding has the necessary knowledge to safeguard assignments are inadequate.

 

2. Responsibility for different tasks is not sufficient clarified. The systematic efforts to develop and imple- ment routines and keep abreast of that they are renowned, been followed and eminently suitable, is insufficient.

 

The deadline for feedback on the introduction of measures to correct deviations is August 15, 2016.

Date 04/25/2016

Anne Grete Robøle
audit owner

Torill Vebenstad
accountant

governor of Hordaland has the authority to oversee the health and care services for supervision Act with health care service § 2.

the report is compiled by an audit of Meland municipality. Authority is a part of the countrywide supervision of health and care services in 2016.

The purpose of the audit is to assess whether the municipality by saying management (internal control) ensured that claims lovgjevinga being lived. Upon audit, we investigated

• what action the municipality has to uncover, correct and preventing breaches of legislation Within the dei inspection program encompassing

 

• the types of assistance are being followed up in practice and if necessary corrected

 

• if the measures are currently good enough to ensure that lovgjevinga are been followed

 

Authority diaper performed as system audit. A system audit being undertaken by examining documents, interviews and other investigations.

The report is about findings of supervision and therefore Inga comprehensive condition assessment of the work the municipality has made Within the dei regions that audit encompassed.

• Variance concerns that requirements imposed by or in accordance with law or regulation, not been met.

 

Rådmannen govern the services in line to the leader for home and the services department Head of services for mental dis- abilities. The services to mental dis- abilities, age 18 and older who live in eigen Housing, organized by permanent staff in work teams related to each user. Except bufellesskap are the services given ein for ein. Paper will have self-identified follow needs and improvement area of ​​the services to developing impaired:

• several employees with graduate education.

 
• improving the knowledge by adding the structured and targeted environmental work.

 
• Documentation.

 

The audit encompassed follow activities:
Notification supervision framework was sent on 3 February, 2016.

Pre-assessments diaper completed on 25 February 2016.
Answer the survey about drug handling nappy been received on March 18, 2016.

Opening Meeting diaper holding 5 April
Interview: 16 persons diaper interviewed.
conversations with up users diaper completed on 5 and 6 April.
> sampling: Journal and brukarpermar, rotation schedule and roster Easter 2016 beskjedbok with more, see Chapter 8.
Final Meeting diaper holding 8 April.

Overview of the contestants at the audit, document that we fekk sent in advance and document what was examined during the audit, is given in Chapter 8.

We have examined whether the municipality by systematic management and leadership has facilitated, came with them and if necessary implements changes so that persons with developmental disabilities receive defense medical health and care services and the requirements of law and regulations are complied with.

the audit encompassed:

1. Implementation of personal assistance, restricted to:
   – Supervision and help to safeguard eigen care
   – Help for activation
   – Training in daglege gjeremål, personal care and eigen care

 

2. Health services in the home and available for medical examination and treatment, confining to:
   – Drug Handling, istandgjering and distribution
   – Follow-up after medical visits and follow-up to assess the necessary medical care from a doctor
   – Health care by acute condition
   – Commune medverknad the user core in contact with and is been followed to a GP or doctor in specialist health
   – Help during office visits to convey information that the doctor need to provide health care
   – dissemination of information from medical visits back to those who provide health services in the home of user.

 

In connection with each topic we examined also how the municipality has arranged for and varetek use cleaning right to information and medverknad. We investigated and whether the municipality requested police at an offer for recruiting staff.

The audit encompassed not services being provided by the use of coercion and force, practical assistance households, client-managed personal assistance, medical care at emergency and dental services. About GP and specialist health provides sound professional health care and on the family doctor conducts regular health of the users, were also not part of the audit.

Variance 1: Systematic measures to ensure that adding have the necessary knowledge to safeguard assignments are inadequate.

Deviation from: Regulation on internal Control in health care § 4 a and c, cf. Act on municipal health services § 3- 1, third paragraph, ref. § 4-1 letter c and d and § 4-2.

the discrepancy build upon follow:

• It’s not all employees who have been sufficient information and training about the condition and needs of the bracken source users can make, before they lasted set into rotation. It is stated that in several instances is set too short a time for training.

 
• It is not everyone who provides services for mental dis- abilities who have been trained in first aid for employment in home services.

 
• It’s not all primary contacts who know the tasks conferred primary contact, ref. Council font physician routine. The debt for example assignments in connection with the preparation and evaluation of the action plan and individual plans.

 
• There are different perceptions of what will be documented in the medical records

 

• It’s not all that familiar routines for reporting any deviation and in what cases it may be appropriate to report. Several states that there is underreporting.

 
• Random samples show that deviations debt drug handling is recorded in the patient record. It is unclear whether other anomalies that debt intermediation to user must also register with the journal or be reported in other ways.

 
• Employees who provide services to the users dei Sami, have not always necessary knowledge and common understanding of how the individual facilitator Inga of attraction to the user should be, for example, ADL training. Need for more training is frying up paper will.

 

Variance 2: Responsibility for different tasks is not sufficient clarified. The systematic efforts to develop and imple- ment routines and keep abreast of that they are renowned, been followed and eminently suitable, is insufficient.

Deviation from: Regulation on Internal Control in Health Care § 4 a, g and h and the law on municipal health services § 3-1 third paragraph, cf.. § 4-1 c and d and § 4-2.

the discrepancy build upon follow:

• it is not sufficient clarified and known sequences that look that there is consistency between decisions regarding health and care services and action plans. Seven out of 16 users can make decisions from 2013 or previously years.

 
• It is given various information about know who is responsible for developing, evaluating and updating action plans.

 
• The function system coordinator is not sufficient clarified.

 
• Goals and measures for the training of user is not clearly seen in action plans.

 
• It does not go forward of routine for journaling how training of user will / should be documented.

 
• sampling medical records showed that not all action plans are updated.

 
• There are big separators candidates in kva, each and how often it will be documented in the medical record. In some journals it is a long time between the note.

 
• sampling brukarpermar shows that not everyone is up to date.

 

There is often not enough time to evaluate and conclude on the working methods and measures are eminently suitable for achieving targets in the action plan, possibly about goals and or initiatives should be changed. The debt for example measures to tryggje, develop or maintain holding trained ADL functions. Planlagde meeting being canceled. It is reported to paper will that it is too long between joint meeting of some teams.

Individual plans are not updated. When the audit was six planar is in progress.

The lead opposition not routines for decision-making about, preparation, evaluation and updating of individual plans.

It is not enough just clarified how information should be conveyed back to services when parents / relatives have been followed user to doctor / specialist health.

Practices to document that the user has been given real medicine is being done in different ways depending on what personnel performing task. In summer event will be no documentation.

It is not enough just clarified what information from the services to the development inhibited to report fallen in line from branch owner to councilman.

leadership is aware of conditions here. Where corrective measures are put into effect, have they hitherto not had sufficient impact.

Leader and adding emphasize that the users will get contribute by facilitating and implementing services and various activities. With the exception of services for those who cage in bufellesskap, are the services provided ein for ein. We have not a basis for concluding that the services being provided, is indefensible. With Novera staffing are the services in particular vulnerable to planned absence of permanent personnel in the work team for each of the users.

Chief boards the services to developing impaired in line to the leader for home and the services department owner. By audit there uncovered pervasive deficiencies in the leadership and management of its activities which in our view increases the risk of failure in the services to persons with developmental disabilities. With sound resturants management assumes that there will arbeidd systematically to prevent and detect incidents where it has or can malfunction, correcting and preventing that same happens again. In connection with the paper will its review of resturants and management system, it is insufficiently evaluated on practices and routines are well enough eminently suitable to safeguard its users their needs and comply with requirements in the health and omsorgslovgjevinga.

• law of 30 March 1984 no. 15 supervision of health and care services

 

• The Act of 24 June 2011 on the municipal health care

 

• The Act of 2 July 1999. 63 on patient and user rights

 

• The Act of 2 July 1999 no. 64 relating to health m.v.

 
• The Act of 10 February 1967 relating to procedure in cases concerning public

 

• Regulation of 21 December 2000 no. 1385 relating to patient

 

• Regulation of 20 December 2002 no. 1731 on internal control in health and care services

 

• Regulation of 27 June 2003 nr.792 of quality in nursing and care

 

• Regulation of 3 April 2008 no. 320 on medication management for businesses and personnel providing health care

 

• Regulation of 16 December 2012 No.. 1256 on habilitation and rehabilitation, individual plans and coordinator

 

INFORMATION awards received from Meland Municipality:

E letter 1st March 2016 enclosed

• Organization Chart

 

• Detailed organizational charts Meland home teneste

 

• Name of owner and others in staff functions – services for the handicapped

 

• Information about bufellesskap and Service capitals

 

• Goals and Strategic Plan 2016 – 2019 for Meland home occupational and Meland nursing

 

• Meland home teneste – subdelegasjon per 12.16.14

 

• Subdelegasjon coordinator – sakshandsamar

 

• Procedural Routine by omgjering of positions

 

• Strategy Document for recruitment

 

• Competence Plan for Meland municipality – action plans for eins source occupational area in 2016

 

• Examples of omgjering of heimehjelp position to vernepleiarheimel

 

• Examples of omgjering of Health postures to environmental therapist position

 

• Examples of omgjering of heimehjelp position on health postures

 

• Competence Plan for Meland municipality 2012 – 2015

 

• Procedure – information to appointments

 

• Checklist – training of new appointments in your home The service

 

• Domination training plan – users with disabilities

 

• Checklist for training

 

• Information for new appointments

 

• Supervisor iplos – registration of information in the connection with decisions about renting

 

• Mapping Form – user to move to eigen Housing

 

• Procedure for case processing in home The service

 

• Procedure primary contact

 

• Attachments – procedure primary contact – deepening users with disabilities

 

• Template for meeting structure

 

• Overview of meetings for employees in home services that work with persons with disabilities

 

• Procedure – patient documentation and report

 

• Deviation Form

 

• Rosters

 

• Week Planar

 

• Procedure for drug manageability in caregiving

 

• Checklist practical training

 

• Contract Form – delegated greyhound drug manageability

 

• Procedure – receiving patients by hospitals residence

 

• Email notification procedure between Plomer and health care businesses

 

• Individual plan – SAMPRO

 

• Note – liability groups per March 2016

 

• Results of the User Survey care 2014

 

Unknown public, cf. Offline a. § 13 cf. PAA. § 13:
administrative work and decision on the allocation of services

Sampling

• 16 patient

 

• Eight brukarpermar

 

• Reported deviations from 1 January 2016

 

• Minutes from the meeting of the work team, team meeting in bufellesskap and staff meeting

 

• Rosters Easter weekend and overview actually staffing at Easter 2016

 

• Beskjedbok

 

• Work List

 

• Receipt Lists capable made and distributed medicine

 

• Individual plans

 

Document what was submitted

• Eight brukarpermar

 

• Reported deviations from 1 January 2016

 

• Minutes from the meeting of the work team, team meeting in bufellesskap and staff meeting

 

• Rosters Easter weekend and overview actually staffing at Easter 2016

 

• Beskjedbok

 

• Work List

 

• Receipt Lists capable made and distributed medicine

 

• Individual plans

 

• Job description coordinator for the handicapped, 20 March 2002

 

• Proposal for mandate – functional responsibility for coordinating unit in Meland municipality

 

• Overview of individual plans created in SAMPRO

 

• Summary of primary contacts for mental dis- abilities who enter for the course of coordinator and individual plan

 

Correspondence between Meland municipality and governor of Hordaland :

• Notification of Supervision, letter of 3 February 2016 from governor of Hordaland

 

• E-letter with attachments from Meland municipality 11. February 2016 about know who’s municipal contact

 

• E-letter with attachments from Meland municipality 15. February 2016 about sequences as contestants on preliminary meeting

 

• E-letter with attachments from governor of Hordaland on 26 February 2016 survey of drug handling

 

• E-letter with attachments from Meland Municipality 1st March 2016, documentation which we had requested

 

• E-letter with attachments from Meland municipality on 8 March 2016 primary contacts in bufellesskap

 

• E-letter with attachments from governor of Hordaland 9th March 2016, the transmission of the program

 

• E-letter with attachments from Meland municipality on 18 March 2016 in response to surveys of drug handling

 

• E-letter with attachments from governor of Hordaland 18 March 2016, the transmission of corrected program

 

• E-letter with attachments from governor of Hordaland 30 March 2016, the transmission of the program

 

Other information

• E-letters from local branches owner in Norwegian Order of development inhibited about tenestetilbodet in Meland municipality.

 

The table below provides an overview of the participants on opening up meeting and final meeting, and over what people who nappy interviewed.

 

 


 
 

 

 
 
 


 
 

 

 
 
 


 
 

 

 
 
 


 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
 
 


 
 

 

 
 
 


 
 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 

 

 


 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 

 

 
 
 


 
 

 

 

 

 

Participants at the audit

Name	Function / position	Pre-assessments	Opening Meeting	Interview	End Meeting
Monica Agledal	Social educators		X	X	X
Anne Marit Andresen	Hjelpepleier		X	X	X
Rannveig Vats Helle Bovim	Coordinator for the handicapped		X	X	X
Marianne Bratshaug	Social educators		X	X
Signe E. H. Carlsen	carer		X	X
Matilde Bastesen Dale	Environmental Work			X
Helene Hammer	Health Work			X
May Linn Hvedding Hansen	Environmental Work			X
Ingvild Hjelmtveit	Chief		X	X	X
Bjorg Haaland	Heimehjelp		X	X	X
Christel Knudsen	Social educators			X
Josefine Kristoffersen	Social educators			X
Helge Kvam	Adviser	X	X		X
Britt Romarheim	Leader, heim residues residues	X	X	X	X
Nina Till Fjord	Department Leader	X	X	X	X
Janne Vinnes	Social educators		X	X	X
Kari Wellbrock	Førskulelærar			X

From the County attended:
Torill Vebenstad, Senior Adviser
Oliver Moldestad, Adviser
Arne Erstad, Senior Adviser
Anne Grete Robøle, section owner

Go to top

Corruption Accusations, newspaper controversy and a protest resignation of Freedom Committee – journalist

Leif Steinholt is a journalist in Helgelands Blad and has been a member of the Press Freedom of choice since 2010. Last week, he chose to resign in protest. He raises critical questions about the committee’s rebuke of “systematic unfair and unfounded delaying tactics and access denial” in Alstahaug municipality in Nordland.

The local controversy involves suspicions of corruption in connection with a disputed hotel project in the municipal center Sandnessjøen where Helgelands Sheet located.

In the neighboring town of Mosjoen published competitor Helgelenders. It was this newspaper, and especially journalist Jill Mari Erichsen , which put a critical spotlight on hotels matter. The concerns that the mayor of Alstadhaug municipality signed an agreement for a new hotel building that should have given one developer major benefits.

Freedom Committee, which is run under the auspices of the Norwegian Press Association, used the case as an example of the government sabotages transparency. You can read more about Hotel matter in the sample collection of examples from last fall (p. 11-13).

Called coverage media scandal

Steinholt’s longstanding leader of Helgeland and Salten Journalists and has also been deputy to the Norwegian Union of Journalist National Board. His own newspaper and Helgelenders went slaughter each other in their coverage of the hotel project.

Helgelands Blad thinks there was evidence of some of the accusations of corruption. Editorialized March 2, 2015 came the newspaper with this power salvo against competitor:

“journalism practiced by Helgelenders in this case represents a low point, as the editors of the newspaper still chooses to remain thick and thin with. Until any new information brought forward in public, we regard the whole affair as a media scandal. “

Erichsen about Steinholt: Went behind my back

the local controversy also led to Helgelands Blad was fouled in the Press Council. In light of the harsh accusations in the same leader believed PFU that the complainant, a property investor who is closely related to actors in the hotel case, should have been published a response.

Therefore leaving Steinholt selection

in its decision to withdraw from the Press Freedom selection shows Steinholt why he did not report manufacture of hotel matter to vote with their own knowledge of the case.

“Without going into detail, I believe that the arrived gave reason to question how the report describes several facts. I also questioned the evidence base for the crisp description of Alstahaug municipality management. “

The journalist was given access to Stein Holts resignation last week.

You can read it in its entirety here .

Last December 2015 sent Steinholt a six-page memo to committee chair Siri Gedde-Dahl about what he had found out about the case. He writes that she asked him to prepare a new and shorter note which concentrated on two aspects: Transparency The process and the alleged disclosure of a cooperation agreement between the Scandic Seven Sisters and Alstahaug municipality.

“These would be sent Helgelenders journalist and the county governor of Nordland for contradiction. The process I experienced further was, from my standpoint, a strange affair, “writes Steinholt.

Felt suspicion

Steinholt sent new requests for public disclosure committee in February and March this year. The committee decided to close the case and stated that their report stands up well. In sum believes Steinholt that his questions and objections have not been commented on adequately from the committee leadership and management of the Norwegian Press Association.

“In addition, I felt a general suspicion of my motive. If any of the committee is not sitting on significant information which I have not been informed, it is impossible for me to understand that so categorically rejects nuance anything in the report. “

Steinholt claims that he has received negative reactions that he went into the matter, and that several have questioned what is his real motive. He confirmed that he was critical of parts of the competitor Helgelenders coverage, but that the topic for him is how a case is presented in a report by the Freedom Committee.

With a certain reluctance

He said he was also accused of having gone behind the backs of a colleague and behaved ukollegialt.

“I realize it is special that a journalist verify a case documents that include another journalist transparency complaints. I’ve done that with a certain reluctance, since I have seen for myself that it would be able to get negative reactions. Yet, I am of the opinion that journalists are people with power, partly because we can set the agenda for public debate, and that we therefore have to withstand a scrutinizing eye. “

Steinholt also clarifies that he does not have interest in being the municipality’s lawyer, and that he has never claimed that it has everything its on dry ground.

– Feels impossible

he believes that if this had been about a great and heavy rikssak covered by Aftenposten or VG – and not a cause very few have heard of in the provinces somewhere – would things have been different.

“no matter – as this has evolved, it feels impossible for me to join the Freedom Committee further “, concludes the journalist in Helgeland Sheet.

Only focus on transparency

Geddes-Dahl explains that the Committee perceives that the incident in Helgelenders has great social significance. The Committee obtained the history of Helgelenders journalist, sent her version of the municipality’s administrative management and asked for feedback from those who were criticized.

– This was not the substance of the case, but if it had been difficult to access. We adjusted the text somewhat after input from the Mayor of the municipality, and we restored his views where there was strong disagreement between the journalist and chief administrative officer.

Steinholt was out on maternity leave and was therefore not involved in creating the report, but did it for review before it was published. When he reacted in several formulations. This led the Commission chairman took several new checking phones to people who knew the case and adjusted the text somewhat.

Steinholt was according Gedde-Dahl still not satisfied. A few weeks after the report was released, he gave the new message that he meant the pool was too critical of the municipality’s handling of transparency requirements from Helgelenders.

Geddes-Dahl says she reviewed the case again:

– I went through this point by point and asked Steinholt create a tighter note which could be sent both journalist (Erichsen, editor.) and county, which had handled the complaints. He did. I forwarded and received an answer. This documented not that our formulations was wrong, and then we could not do more.

Steinholt sent ever new inquiries, and finally asked Gedde-Dahl General Kjersti Loken Stavrum in Norwegian Press Association to take the case.

Stavrum said to the journalist that she underwent all the documents.

– There was a lingering mail exchange with Steinholt. Eventually we had to just observe that we had different views.

Thus sent Steinholt resignation letter.

Got offered footnote

– You might municipality has delayed, but from the documentation I have seen, it does not appear that this relationship is as serious as described in report. It is a deliberate misrepresentation to say that the Committee’s description of the case purely on transparency. It contains an unbalanced, twisted and skjeiv presentation of facts, which support the main conclusion, says Steinholt to journalist.

– Could not you just expressed a dissenting opinion and remains in committee?

– I did offer to bring in a footnote. But I do not think that the committee went deep enough into it I made. In addition, it is difficult to continue when I am faced with a high degree of suspicion of my motives. From my side, the focus has been only cases presented in the report.

Steinholt adding that he thinks it’s sad to leave the selection, which he believes makes a very important job.

Child Welfare caseworker in twin case called grandparents for “simple … – TV 2

First took CPS twin girls Natasha and Erik with the main rationale that Natasha is mentally retarded.

Then there was evidence that she is not.

And for just under two weeks ago it became clear that the couple gets twins their return.

Sorry

Now you TV2 tell that child welfare officer, during a meeting, called the parents of Erik – that grandparents of twins – for ” simple people. “

Rådmannen in Stange municipality apologize and say that this caseworker from now henceforth follow up Natasha, Erik and family.

It was during a meeting in the middle March statement by the caseworker came.

Shocked

Four people were invited to the meeting: Natasha and Erik Mona Utheim who helped them, and Hege Jensen assisting twin parents during meetings.

Everyone was shocked when the caseworker spoke to Erik about his parents. The discussion was about their ability to care for children, and the meeting was documented with hidden recording.

The controversial statement comes when the caseworker refers to sightings of grandparents during visitation with twin girls.

“Simple Men”

the caseworker says: “… we see that parents are caring people, but simple people.”

It reacted eventually heavily on the statement.

Hege Jensen, Assistance Aid, said: “… when you sit down and say they are simple people. So it’s a form of expression that you use? … Basically? “

The caseworker: ” It was only a term that I use now. I do not use it in any note, no. “

Hege Jensen, Assistance Aid: ” I am surprised. I am very surprised. “

Grave

– There are serious simply. I’ve never been lost in similar with respect to child care, says Jensen told TV 2.

– It was such a concern through the room when the sentence came. It is not to believe that a man can sit characterizing others on the way there, says Utheim, who is a supporter of twin parents.

grandparents reviewer

The grandparents, who were not present were informed about what they had been called. They have police caseworker for defamation.

– We were properly cursed both. We’ve got two cubs even as we have fostered. They are now 25 and 21 years. So there is nothing to indicate that we are poor caregivers, says grandfather Jan-Erik Myra TV 2.

Will followed up

TV 2 have played the hidden recording for alderman in Stange municipality, Stein-Erik Thorud.

He regrets.

– the starting point for me is that we should mention residents in Stange, clients and others we have to do, in a respectful manner. The term “simple people” do not belong in the terminology. I regret that the term is used.

– What will you do about it?

– that we will follow up as an internal matter.

– She is the executive officer on the case now. And have said this. Will she be taken off the case?

– I can not decide here and now.

– what respect is there for other people to use such concepts?

– I said earlier that I expect of this organization no matter that we refer to each other in a respectful manner. The term “simple people” do not belong in the terminology. I apologize.

– But it was used by her?

– The sorry I.

Requesting scrutiny

after the interview says alderman that after an overall assessment is decided that the examiner no longer has to follow up the family.

He also warns that municipality will ask the county investigating child welfare treatment of Erik and Natasha.

he stressed that he has neither instruction right or right of access to the municipal child welfare work, and that the media focus on the issue makes the need for an independent assessment.

– I have confidence in the CPS, but think it is important that we now get a review of this matter. And get lit all aspects of a third party, says the alderman.

Child Welfare caseworker in twin case called grandparents for “simple … – TV 2

First took CPS twin girls Natasha and Erik with the main rationale that Natasha is mentally retarded.

Then there was evidence that she is not.

And for just under two weeks ago it became clear that the couple gets twins their return.

Sorry

Now you TV2 tell that child welfare officer, during a meeting, called the parents of Erik – that grandparents of twins – for ” simple people. “

Rådmannen in Stange municipality apologize and say that this caseworker from now henceforth follow up Natasha, Erik and family.

It was during a meeting in the middle March statement by the caseworker came.

Shocked

Four people were invited to the meeting: Natasha and Erik Mona Utheim who helped them, and Hege Jensen assisting twin parents during meetings.

Everyone was shocked when the caseworker spoke to Erik about his parents. The discussion was about their ability to care for children, and the meeting was documented with hidden recording.

The controversial statement comes when the caseworker refers to sightings of grandparents during visitation with twin girls.

“Simple Men”

the caseworker says: “… we see that parents are caring people, but simple people.”

It reacted eventually heavily on the statement.

Hege Jensen, Assistance Aid, said: “… when you sit down and say they are simple people. So it’s a form of expression that you use? … Basically? “

The caseworker: ” It was only a term that I use now. I do not use it in any note, no. “

Hege Jensen, Assistance Aid: ” I am surprised. I am very surprised. “

Grave

– There are serious simply. I’ve never been lost in similar with respect to child care, says Jensen told TV 2.

– It was such a concern through the room when the sentence came. It is not to believe that a man can sit characterizing others on the way there, says Utheim, who is a supporter of twin parents.

grandparents reviewer

The grandparents, who were not present were informed about what they had been called. They have police caseworker for defamation.

– We were properly cursed both. We’ve got two cubs even as we have fostered. They are now 25 and 21 years. So there is nothing to indicate that we are poor caregivers, says grandfather Jan-Erik Myra TV 2.

Will followed up

TV 2 have played the hidden recording for alderman in Stange municipality, Stein-Erik Thorud.

He regrets.

– the starting point for me is that we should mention residents in Stange, clients and others we have to do, in a respectful manner. The term “simple people” do not belong in the terminology. I regret that the term is used.

– What will you do about it?

– that we will follow up as an internal matter.

– She is the executive officer on the case now. And have said this. Will she be taken off the case?

– I can not decide here and now.

– what respect is there for other people to use such concepts?

– I said earlier that I expect of this organization no matter that we refer to each other in a respectful manner. The term “simple people” do not belong in the terminology. I apologize.

– But it was used by her?

– The sorry I.

Requesting scrutiny

after the interview says alderman that after an overall assessment is decided that the examiner no longer has to follow up the family.

He also warns that municipality will ask the county investigating child welfare treatment of Erik and Natasha.

he stressed that he has neither instruction right or right of access to the municipal child welfare work, and that the media focus on the issue makes the need for an independent assessment.

– I have confidence in the CPS, but think it is important that we now get a review of this matter. And get lit all aspects of a third party, says the alderman.

- Norway will receive 218 Syrians month – TV 2

Norway is the country that will accept most Syrians, the note shows that the German news agency DPA has been granted access.

EU Home Affairs was Thursday gathered to review the agreement with Turkey giving the EU an opportunity to returning refugees and migrants arriving by sea to Greece, upon extracting one Syrian refugee for every acids that are returned. The agreement applies up to 72,000 refugees.

The next four months will total 4,488 Syrians retrieved, according to the preliminary allocation plan. Of these, Norway accept 218 a month, while France must deal with 148, Italy 118 and Germany 100.

The Ministry of Justice denies Thursday night information.

– It is not true, writes communications manager Gunnar A. Johansen in an email said.

NTB