- Suffering from major shortcomings – Telemarksavisa

SKI: Småaksjonær Per Otterdahl Moller believes Kontorbygg AS closest driver Skien Investment Impact AS as a shop in the store.

It has broken out unrest in Skien Investment Impact AS ahead 2-initial summons has for treatment of 2014 accounts.

In a sharp note to the board of Skien Investment Impact AS rattles Møller up number of critical issues.

What is the board’s motives for not following the Companies Act and how long has this been going on, ask Møller referring to THE SCHEDULE AGM in April was canceled as a result of any shareholders ‘usually’ and to cancel the meeting has received the notice. Just advertising in the newspapers is not enough, says Møller.

Store missing

Furthermore Møller to the financial statements for 2014 were sent the Register prior to the general meeting before the statement was approved by shareholders. It breaks with the Companies Act.

Shareholder Register in Skien Investment Impact AS suffers from major shortcomings with regard to shareholders with unknown address.

Mills asks what steps the board has taken to rectify the shortcomings.

The Board recognizes that shareholders with a known address, but where account numbers are not registered, unpaid dividends.

Shareholder Mills believes that this practice is contrary to Companies Act.

Capital

Last year financial statements for Skien Investment Impact shows a book equity of 6.7 million and 1.5 million in current liabilities.

This debt is entirely connected dividends not identified shareholders.

Per Otterdahl Møller company claims will allow non-paid dividend be in the company until obsolescence and then reimburse the amount to the company’s equity.

– This practice transfers values ​​from some shareholders to all shareholders and especially the Office which has 61 percent of shares in Skien Investment Board, says Møller.

For the financial statements that were presented in April was 723,600 kroner proposed reversed with the possibility of further 1 , 5 million dollars later.

Provides a damn separate item

This solution favors the main shareholder Office, says Møller.

– Office operates Skien Investment Impact as an internal store believes Mills as he stressed flout its own shares but does not accept that a company goes forward in this way.

The Board self-criticism

The Board of Skien Investment Impact consists of Chairman Rolf Erling Andersen and members Roger Wahlstrøm, Hanne Nilssen and Nils O Langeland managing director. Langeland answers the criticisms.

– The Board recognizes there have been challenges with the company’s shareholder structure and admits it is required by written notice to all aksjonærer.Det also acknowledges that 2014 statement was mistakenly sent the Register before the meeting. The accounts are now canceled and sent again.

– We are working to update the shareholder information, but can not see that the company will enable additional resources to enable passive owners. Skien Investment Board has a number of small shareholders.

Today there are 540 shareholders representing 1,417 shares who have not received dividends.

Population Registry does not provide information about who is the rightful heirs to aksjer.Styret says it’s accumulated arrears related to shareholders through dividends and capital depreciation.

statute provides access to reclassify from current liabilities to equity and thus will passive shareholders retain their rights to dividends beyond the limitation period, the board believes. Skien Investment Board has today financial investments for roughly 2.2 million while the former also operated in the property market.

Alea jacta est – Document.no

Alea jacta est, dice (soldered) is thrown – must be Caesars words when he year 49 BC went over the border river Rubicon and therefore took the decision to launch the civil war against Pompey. Today thrown the dice to determine minister’s efforts.

On the televised half conference on Wednesday spoke Erna Solberg (H) to the nation about the government’s work over the past half year. Journalists who were present began the press conference by referring to their counterparts in Dagsavisen that same day had given the prime minister and the ministers of the dice. It was pointed out that Prime Minister Erna Solberg got dice wood, and that this could prey on her authority as prime minister.

Erna Solberg and her crew can take this concern very slowly because there is nothing to suggest that bad dice scare voters. In 2006, only one year after the coalition government took office, used the so-called expert commentators word clutter, noise and buzz about the Stoltenberg government. The coalition government was also killed by the people and Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg (Ap) were rated 2.

For Jens Stoltenberg and his men and women are not the result uplifting. Top scorer Foreign Minister who gets dice four. Justice Minister Knut Storberget (Ap), International Development Erik Solheim (SV) and Defence Minister Anne-Grete Strøm-Erichsen (Ap) is a dice wood. The rest of the ministers and Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg gets dice two.

Two years later in 2008 concluded tv2 that there had been a bad year for the government who received an average score of less than three.

The result was poor, with an average of under 3.

The four ministers will dice one. Only three get dice five. Not once ended dice of six.

The coalition ministers sat at King’s board until 2013, so the blue government need not worry for the match die. What government however must worry about the decline in investment on the shelf and recession in the oil industry. It is not pleasant when unemployment figures are rising, but at the same time good to know that we have the best crew in the government offices to obtain new growth and new jobs in the country. With rising unemployment, it is a blessing for the country that we have a government that focuses on Norwegian business conditions, and including lower capital tax – a special tax for Norwegian owners. It’s almost hard to believe that the Socialists will retain the wealth tax and thereby favoring multinational corporations, rather than locally Norwegian ownership.

There has been very much positive on the justice front since the blue captured government offices. After half a year with blue government was made a historical decision in Parliament. Man removed the statutory limitation on murder, incest and abuse. The blue government has also been stopped naughty with payments of family allowances and other social benefits to barnekidnappere.

Crime statistics show that the crime rate drops, partly associated with a major focus on police. From 2013 to 2014 increased staffing in the police with 725 FTEs and a record number of foreigners were expelled from the country. Which police itself describes as important crime prevention.

Zoning queues were long when Anders Anundsen (FRP) took over as Minister of Justice in 2013. He showed action and innovation when he launched the idea of ​​renting prison places in the Netherlands. Hånflire set loose in kommentariatet over Justice Minister’s idea but sneers have subsided after Anders Anundsen (FRP) signed the lease in the Netherlands earlier this year. (The coalition solution atonement queues were significant enough to give criminals centuries in criminal groups). The blue is now hiring prison spaces while the construction of new prisons. The aim is that within a few years have enough prison places here at home.

Anyone who thought it was a pity that the coalition removed the coat of arms of the police cars, can now rejoice over the coat of arms of the cross will return.

The government Solberg has delivered on many points and many arrows pointing to where they should be. It is an accomplishment that we had a reduction in the number of asylum seekers coming to Norway by four percent in 2014. This happened while asylum applications in Europe rose by 40 percent, and for the first time in ten years taking Denmark welcomed more asylum seekers than Norway. Attorney Anundsen who has been in eighteen months and managed all this get character one in Dagsavisen, former Arbeiderbladet, where Ap-husband Arne Strand’s editor in chief.

The neat statistics on immigration field will soon change when the parliamentary majority Syria refugees begin to arrive the country. Interestingly tries NRK to make an issue of the prime minister did not say anything about Syria-decision in his speech.

Erna Solberg did not mention the disputed Syria-decision in its review of government policy.

– The government needs to showcase that the radar is working government with its projects. The press conference is an attempt to correct the impression of a government that wars internally and in conflict with their partners, says NRK commentator Magnus Takvam.

Takvam absolutely right. Government must of course try to correct the skewed impression press give the government’s work. Erna Solberg was asked whether Syria refugees was a natural theme for the campaign. Solberg responded so well that the journalist who asked the question had to feel uneasy. The Prime Minister advocated clearly topic was a matter of course for the campaign, just as refugee policy discussed in all European countries ahead of any election.

Some believe that FRP should go out of the government after the defeat of Syria affair. The result is disappointing, and you would like to see another, but those who advocate FRP exit, should think carefully about what the alternative is. It is such as the Prime Minister pointed out Wednesday that government power is not just about the major battles in parliament, but about all the small steps taken each day.

Prime Minister Erna Solberg and her ministers is something else than Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg and his crew. One of the first the coalition government and the then Norwegian Ministry of Education (SV) did in 2005 was to demand immediate stop bordbønn in school. When grace was removed, opened the coalition for prayer and prayer in school because it is now named it could feels indecent to deny and because instruction in schools should promote intellectual freedom, and that all forms of discrimination be counteracted .

Erna Solberg and Anders Anundsen During the eighteen months provided for more police and the criminal zones, the number of asylum seekers is reduced, that murder cases are not barred, that social benefits are not granted to criminals and the coat of arms and the cross reintroduced in police cars. This is something quite other than Jens Stoltenberg and former Minister of Justice Knut Storberget (Ap) who wanted hijab in the police. Something they admittedly refused to admit for the Norwegian people, but a secret memo revealed them.

Justice Minister Storberget also tried to curtail freedom of speech – this liberty mother if all other freedoms rests, attempted wing clip! Labor and Storberget plan was to criminalize criticism of “faiths and beliefs.” Storberget simply wanted to restrict freedom of expression when we need it most. VG wrote about Storberget sinister idea from 2008 after it was rejected due to large popular opposition.

Before Christmas, the government proposed to remove the blasphemy law in the new Penal Code, in line with the desire of AP and SV. But instead of letting it join the government proposed to expand racism clause to apply to hate speech so that criminal law did “a safeguard against qualified attacks on faiths and beliefs.”

– This was Storberget idea and he thought it should be a good case for the government, said several government sources Newspaper News Agency (ANB).

Based on some facts about the issues the Attorney General of Labor proposed and was busy off, there is an interesting observation that tv2 gave Storberget dice three in December 2008, while journalist colleagues in Dagsavisen gives Anders Anundsen grade one in June 2015.

Labor leader Jonas Gahr Støre for years been borne of Norwegian journalists. They have undeservedly placed Støre on a pedestal and let him get away with the most hair-raising antics. Have you forgotten that Gahr Støre nursed contacts with terrorist leaders in Hamas – but tried to wriggle out of this fact when tv2 he revealed? Have you forgotten that Minister failed fundamentally when our flags and embassies were on fire? Have you forgotten that the coalition and Gahr Støre sent a delegation to the Middle East in the aftermath of the fires embassy to apologize that Norwegians used their freedom of expression? And have you forgotten that Gahr Støre let out his itinerary to Afghanistan on MFA sites, despite the fact that he was terroradvart ahead of PST? This misjudgment may have been the reason why the Dagbladet journalist Carsten Thomassen was shot and killed in the terrorist attack on Støre hotel, Serena Hotel in Kabul in January 2008. It allowed this fort was forgotten, for despite the fatal misjudgment was Gahr Støre awarded a fiver both from journalists and from voters later that year.

The government Solberg delivers to those who want that criminals serve and that Islamization stops. The coalition (and yellow) would like to see the blue trend will be reversed. The false humanists sacrifices now hundreds of thousands of refugees in neighboring areas for a few thousand to get hit. To the Pharisaic playful continue. Under the guise of humanity can favor the few at the expense of the many, one can continue to country of Christians, while sticking new place obstacles in the current government.

The journalists have thrown dice and the decision is taken: The government’s medium, and Justice Minister fail. Dice confirms journalists’ desire for a steady course towards secularisation, higher immigration, rising crime and more Islamization.

Alea jacta est.

After Grexit – Dagens Næringsliv

Hellas kan synke. EU vil seile videre.

Publisert: 29.06.2015 — 21:48

Artikkelen er lagt til i din leseliste.

«Du bør ikke begå selvmord, fordi du er redd for døden», sa EU-president Jean-Claude Juncker til grekerne i mandag, og anbefalte dem å si ja til EU i søndagens folkeavstemning – mens aksjekursene falt, og det var kaos i Aten.

Analytikerne og sjeføkonomene skrev at balansen hadde tippet: En gresk utmarsj fra eurosonen er nå det mest sannsynlige.

Dette vil gi et nytt kapittel i euroens historie, skjønt neppe det siste.

For en uke siden la Juncker og de fire andre presidentene i EUs ulike institusjoner frem en felles plan for å unngå fremtidige ulykker av gresk type.

Hint goes for fusion – Trønder-Avisa

The Board of Hint went unanimously to follow the principal Steinar beak proposal to go into negotiations with the University of Nordland (Uin) and Nesna to establish a new university in central Norway.

Assuming that the negotiations succeed, the Board has – against five votes – agreed to a merger with effect from 1 January 2016.

– Strengthened for the Future

After an hour and forty minutes long debate, could chairman Bjørg Tørresdal putting stroke for an important choice of route for Hint.

– I think this will strengthen us in the future, says Tørresdal.

Hint has worked with a future merging with other colleges and universities for a long time. The desire for a trøndersk collaboration with Sør-Trøndelag University College and NTNU has proved impossible to reach the finish with, and Hint have therefore concentrated on looking north – in addition to stand alone.

– Mitt heart says that there had been good to go alone. We are a medium sized university with good results, with a clear profile, and an important profession educates in Nord-Trøndelag. The reason I can not choose it, is that tomorrow is not equal to the present day, says the chairman.

– Important not to spend too long

The Parliament has given a clear message: they want that something is done with college and university structure in Norway.

The rate of fusion work was one of the points that were most discussed.

– The timing of the merger is a part of choice of route, even if the choice of route is the direction we should go, says Tørresdal, who defend a merger already from January.

She makes it clear that it is important to keep the speed up in the ongoing process. Others thought the pace now screwed up, and that there is a need to apply some pressure on the brakes.

– There are lots we must do before things are in place. Maybe we lose not so much time if we make this decision in the autumn, argued employee representative Grete Bøgh Naess.

The employees’ unions gave in a note to the Board was informed that it would be appropriate to use more time.

– Our employees are our most important resource. If we get a process in which the employees do not feel taken care of, the process goes out of the work area, said Reidar Viken, who also voted against the merger from 2016.

– We are losing time and strength in forhandlingspoisjonen by to spend more time. We are not stronger of postponing the decision, said Professor Knut Ingar Westeren.

Thursday’s meeting was the last current Board had. From August 1 a the new board in place. Already on 30 October, the plan is that the merger becomes a reality – if the negotiations leading up.

– We make choice of route, the new board puts its stamp on it, illustrates Tørresdal.

Here is the decision by the board:

1. Board agrees that HiNT enter negotiations with the University of Nordland on the establishment

of a new university in central Norway. The premise of controlling matter to be guiding principles for

negotiations.

2. Board approves merger with the University of Nordland and Nesna with effect

from 01.01.2016 on condition that the negotiations leading to a merger

that the new board can approve autumn 2015.

3. The board gives the chairman the authority to establish negotiating and add a plan

negotiations with the University of Nordland.

Hint goes for fusion – Trønder-Avisa

The Board of Hint went unanimously to follow the principal Steinar beak proposal to go into negotiations with the University of Nordland (Uin) and Nesna to establish a new university in central Norway.

Assuming that the negotiations succeed, the Board has – against five votes – agreed to a merger with effect from 1 January 2016.

– Strengthened for the Future

After an hour and forty minutes long debate, could chairman Bjørg Tørresdal putting stroke for an important choice of route for Hint.

– I think this will strengthen us in the future, says Tørresdal.

Hint has worked with a future merging with other colleges and universities for a long time. The desire for a trøndersk collaboration with Sør-Trøndelag University College and NTNU has proved impossible to reach the finish with, and Hint have therefore concentrated on looking north – in addition to stand alone.

– Mitt heart says that there had been good to go alone. We are a medium sized university with good results, with a clear profile, and an important profession educates in Nord-Trøndelag. The reason I can not choose it, is that tomorrow is not equal to the present day, says the chairman.

– Important not to spend too long

The Parliament has given a clear message: they want that something is done with college and university structure in Norway.

The rate of fusion work was one of the points that were most discussed.

– The timing of the merger is a part of choice of route, even if the choice of route is the direction we should go, says Tørresdal, who defend a merger already from January.

She makes it clear that it is important to keep the speed up in the ongoing process. Others thought the pace now screwed up, and that there is a need to apply some pressure on the brakes.

– There are lots we must do before things are in place. Maybe we lose not so much time if we make this decision in the autumn, argued employee representative Grete Bøgh Naess.

The employees’ unions gave in a note to the Board was informed that it would be appropriate to use more time.

– Our employees are our most important resource. If we get a process in which the employees do not feel taken care of, the process goes out of the work area, said Reidar Viken, who also voted against the merger from 2016.

– We are losing time and strength in forhandlingspoisjonen by to spend more time. We are not stronger of postponing the decision, said Professor Knut Ingar Westeren.

Thursday’s meeting was the last current Board had. From August 1 a the new board in place. Already on 30 October, the plan is that the merger becomes a reality – if the negotiations leading up.

– We make choice of route, the new board puts its stamp on it, illustrates Tørresdal.

Here is the decision by the board:

1. Board agrees that HiNT enter negotiations with the University of Nordland on the establishment

of a new university in central Norway. The premise of controlling matter to be guiding principles for

negotiations.

2. Board approves merger with the University of Nordland and Nesna with effect

from 01.01.2016 on condition that the negotiations leading to a merger

that the new board can approve autumn 2015.

3. The board gives the chairman the authority to establish negotiating and add a plan

negotiations with the University of Nordland.

Center Plana, opportunity analysis for new and renewed buildings in downtown … – Kristiansund municipality

This study applies primarily to land within the planning area for the center plana. In 2016-17 the city will start the revision of the remainder of the municipal.

The municipal center planning group aims to bring out a proposal for a new city plan during 2015. Political treatment and consultation will happen in 2016.

Reply / suggestions sent by email to odd-arild.bugge@kristiansund.kommune.no, or letter to the municipality marked “central plan”.

All suggestions will be collected and evaluated in a separate note to accompany the planning process. In addition, we will host a seminar on downtown development on 8 October 2015. Here, the input will be presented, and we invited a veteran of architecture and city construction from Trondheim, Svein Skibnes to tell about and show how they have done it in Trondheim . The municipality will also engage an architectural firm to illustrate and evaluate proposals (see off. Announcement on Doffin in the near future).

Q we want answers to:

Question 1: Do you / your specific plans, wishes and / or suggestions for development in the city? What?

Question 2: What obstacles do you / you to realize development? (Index may be legislation, financial matters, local government, the market situation, …)

Question 3: How can the municipality make it easier to realize the new developments?

Question 4: Do you know examples from other cities that we can learn from in Kristiansund?

Question 5: Have Kristiansund some forces to build further on in urban development?

Question 6: Other thoughts or feedback on center planning?

Deadline: 15. August 2015

Thank you in advance for help and ideas.

For city planning group

Odd Arild Bugge

THEREFORE ANNOUNCES TV 2 / FYN AND TV SOUTH REGION COUNCIL … – TV SYD

Tuesday 23-06-15 at. 18:31 – Esben Seerup and Betina Bendix

The directors of the two regional TV stations explains why BIOS memorandum has been published.

Last Wednesday, 17 June, revealed TV 2 / FYN and TV Syd, the Regional Council of Southern Denmark now tightens the requirements to the BIOS per. September 1 this year will be responsible for all ambulance services in the region of Southern Denmark.

The news was brought on both television stations in the 19:30 broadcast.

The news emerged from a secret BIOS memo from South Denmark, which among other things says that the region now has sent “a lawyer letter to the BIOS, which udbedes an explanation” for how the BIOS will meet the requirements now only 10-11 weeks.

Like most who have followed in the past six months, fighting BIOS to be able to employ paramedics enough ambulances when BIOS takes over the operation after Falck. Both TV Syd and TV 2 / FYN followed BIOS Falck South Denmark case extremely close.

We do continue when the proceedings in the highest degree of public interest.

Therefore, selected both stations last week to bring the news. And therefore we have decided to publish the entire memo on both tv2fyn.dk and tvsyd.dk, so the people of southern Denmark can assess the case.

This is despite the fact that the note clearly states that Region of Southern lawyer letter-request to be kept “strictly confidential to avoid further negative publicity BIOS”.

On Tuesday South Denmark police report leaked by the secret BIOS memo. Neither TV 2 / FYN or TV South will contribute to this police investigation, since we obviously protect our sources.

Were asked to remove personal attacks on TV2 reporter – Dagbladet.no

In today at half past nine should its anticipated appeal is being considered in the Press Advisory Committee.

Dagbladet could last Wednesday to tell that Anders Cappelen came with briny person characteristics of female TV2 reporters PFU complaint he drafted on behalf of the header surgeon Per Kristian Eide.

“President. Detective-inspired “

Named television reporters were partly described this way:” Just 25 years, ” President. Detective-inspired, “” Blonde, unfolded hair, “” Tight sweater. ” This triggered again strong reactions from prominent commentators.

The article made it clear that Cappelen had to restate the complaint, which was submitted in December 2013, because it its 1,800 pages were too extensive.

A new, shorter and edited complaint document was delivered last spring.

Dagbladet can now reveal that the scope of the media have described as “monster complaint” was only one of several reasons why the massive complaint was asked restated.

In a note prepared by the Norwegian Press Association states that the very strong person attacks was a reason why Cappelen was requested to edit complaint.

Called in to meet

There’s Press Association’s secretariat which administers Norwegian press ethics even judge arrangement, Press Council.

I do not want to comment on this matter until PFU treatment, but I can confirm that there were a number of factors that lay behind our message to Cappelen that he should edit the and shorten the PFU complaint. It is also not unusual that complainants expressed frustration when they complain of Norwegian media, says Kjersti Løken Stavrum, Secretary General of the Norwegian Press Association, told Dagbladet.

Dagbladet is aware that the Press Association in February 2014 organized a meeting of the Parties to the festering conflict.

There participated including neurosurgeon Per Kristian Eide, Anders Cappelen and TV2′s lawyer and editor.

The meeting, which was chaired by Kjersti Løken Stavrum, was intended as a discussion and guidance to the two parties.

Dagbladet know the parties at the meeting, read out points from a note. Among other things, pointed out that the complaint was between 250 and 500 times greater than that of PFU complaint usually is.

“Needless smeared”

The complaint must also have been described as unnecessary smeared and that it emerged that there had been an end in itself make the complaint extensive.

According to the note it was refert from the meeting will also appeal have been designed so that it did not provide a sufficient basis for treatment in PFU.

It was also pointed out that the complaint document contained a number of pictures and references that did not go directly to complain content. The document was also repetitive.

– There is no coverage in PFUs bylaws to require that PFU complaints must be written in a certain way. The changes to the first version of the 52 complaints on TV 2 was primarily done because I knew that they would get better. An irresponsible button deadline meant that I was unable to edit the first version as desired, says Anders Cappelen Dagbladet.

“Personal attacks”

In the current meeting, it was also pointed out that the complaint document contained several rhetorical personal attacks which is not directly concerned the defendant breach of good press conduct.

Among other things, having been shown to a specific example where a named TV2 reporter had to endure that she identified as the most unethical and irresponsible journalist in the Norwegian press in recent time, and that she has taken over this dubious role from another named newspaper reporter.

– It is unacceptable of onion Stavrum to increasingly express themselves negatively in public about my PFU complaints on TV 2 before PFU has spoken. Her role is to be an impartial and independent head of the secretariat coordinator complaints. PFU Secretariat shall safeguard complainants, not criticize and hang them out in the public sphere, says Anders Cappelen.

Kjersti Løken Stavrum told Dagbladet that the secretariat clearly separates the complaint alignment and substance of the complaint.

– In this case it is solely dr. Eide and his cause that is important in our assessment of publication, says Loken Stavrum, which shows that this has been pointed out before.

Cappelen denies that the 52 complaints were written to be large.
– The claim involves an unreasonable suspicion of me. What motive would I have to make them unnecessarily large? Anyone who knows PFU system knows that the stupidest thing one does is to write long complaints, says Anders Cappelen Dagbladet.

Cappelen will the meeting have been given a deadline of two weeks to rework the complaint. It was later expanded.

Closed doors

The first document, which contained 52 complaints were also sent to the Norwegian Board of Health, which has given Dagbladet access to the document. Norwegian Press Association and the two parties will not publish the documents.

Complaint processing shall be held in camera.

– At the meeting Dagbladet refers to said Kjersti Løken Stavrum also that an alternative was that she as Secretary General of the Norwegian Press Association used the right of initiative and appealed to TV2 for the 70 reportages. When I subsequently picked up that ball, she said that it was best that I made an attempt to edit complaints about. When I saw delivered the final version, this accepted. I do not recall that it came some criticism that the complaints were still for long, says Anders Cappelen.

A full day is set aside for the complaints procedure.

In the respondent cases investigated TV2 on top surgeon Per Kristian Eide through her brain research at the National Hospital had exposed patients to danger and inflicted lasting damage.

Most of the complaint points refers to the Code of Ethics provisions on simultaneous refutation, sources and control of information.

The impugned cases were published in the period from 6 December 2012 to 24 October 2013.

Defender reporters

TV 2 rejects the channel has acted wrong.

– Reporters in TV 2 that have dealt with this matter is very professional and conscientious journalists. TV 2 has made a good and important piece of journalism on this issue, and we believe has not violated the Ethical Code. Beyond that I do not want to comment on some of the content of the complaint. Now we look forward to processing in PFU on Monday, the news editor Niklas Lysvåg TV 2 previously stated Dagbladet.

- This is much worse than we first thought – Altaposten

Thursday morning informed Mayor Alf E. Jakobsen and Councilman Leif Vidar Olsen council in Hammerfest on a consultation paper which was released Friday morning. The memo, entitled “Property Taxation of labor and machinery, etc. implement and use, “adds up to big changes in taxation of industrial plants.

Here you put up to two alternative; loss of property taxes for production and installations, or to cut the whole scheme of works and use as a separate tax category, nor ensure that such properties are taxed as ordinary commercial.

Hammerfest is the loser

In the consultation paper drawn Hammerfest voted one of the municipalities that will lose big on the scheme, whatever option:

“The biggest impact on the absolute value will be found in municipalities with large industrial plants, for example Aukra, Lindas, Hammerfest, Tysvær and Øygarden. In each of these municipalities will revenue shortfall could probably be the 100 million dollars. “

The benefit is that companies, in Hammerfest case Statoil, which will be left with.

Can Losing 180 (!) million

For Altaposten Thursday said Councilman Olsen that he fears a loss of income of up to NOK 65 million as a result of these changes.

– From signals we have received, I understand that the consequences at worst could be that a third of our revenues from Melkøya disappears. We have over 200 million in revenue from Melkøya every year. So we are talking about 65 million.

Now type Mayor Alf E. Jakobsen (Ap) on Facebook that the consequences could be even greater. Hammerfest sitting claimed he left with 60 200 million – at best. At worst, the result could be an annual loss of 180 million for the municipality.

– This is far worse than feared yesterday. When we go through the draft document for mills and factories, this will mean that we luckiest case is left with 60 and, at worst, 20 million of 200 million. When Norway’s municipalities as well have great treasure failure on income tax (between 22 and 27 million is likely to Hammerfest) and it comes in far less taxes than the Government itself has based assumptions at this very dramatic especially for petroleum municipalities with landing plant, writes mayor Jakobsen on Facebook.

The reason that Hammerfest hit especially hard is that the Melkøya plant currently taxed as if it is only fixed installations here. With the proposed changes, a large part of the plant is kept away from taxation, then it can be considered mobile equipment.

– If a change is made in the definition of what is a fixed installation, so it will be reflected the way to calculate property tax, said Councilman Olsen to Altaposten Thursday.

– We are six landing municipalities affected and a total of 100 municipalities when we take with other industry municipalities. It will draft document can only be taxing the lot and building and nothing else, writes Mayor Jakobsen on Facebook.

Unacceptable

Helga Pedersen (Labour Party) believes tax proposal provides hopeless impact, not least for Hammerfest part. In the consultation paper shows that the Ministry of Finance envisages that the result will be the relocation of approximately 1.3 billion, from authority, and businesses, particularly large production enterprises including in the oil industry. Hydroelectric power is excluded.

– Here shows Siv Jensen its true face when she earlier this week said that the municipalities do not have the property tax. It seems that the government does not have though that a good school and elderly care is related with a good municipal. A revenue in the billions for the municipalities we are obviously contrary.

Pedersen does not deny that they would welcome a review of the rules for the valuation of tax object.

– But, as they say, it is a difference between shaving and cutting off his head. I will never accept a scheme that allows Hammerfest lose revenue in the order of magnitude we are talking about, she said.

Finnmark lose – again

And better are not speaking of reintroducing municipal corporation.

– This claim they will stimulate economic development in municipalities. But the scheme goes really out to reallocating 2.9 billion in fees. 41 Norwegian municipalities receive increased revenues, 386 municipalities are losing. 18 of 19 municipalities in Finnmark will lose in the scheme, including both Alta (0.5 million) and Hammerfest (1.5 million). Even if it is just small change compared with the Hammerfest is about to lose, so this is also another step in the wrong direction, she said.

Go ahead and start planning your trip to Norway!” – Rush Print

Valldal eller Romsdal, Ex Machina eller Sunshine Superman (foto)?

Nå i juni måned kan det amerikanske kinopublikummet velge og vrake i filmer fra indre Møre og Romsdal. Det er nok mange av oss som gjerne ser at all verdens kinopublikum får flere slike luksusproblem i årene som kommer, og kanskje blir filmmeldingen det verktøyet vi trenger for å trekke flere filmproduksjoner til Norge.

Gudene skal vite at det arbeidet ikke har vært lett: Næringspolitiske filmperspektiver har de siste årene forstummet i et politisk vakuum. De regionale fondene har blitt sulteforet, den nasjonale filmkommisjonen har vært i limbo, og insentivordningen har rukket å bli en utålmodig tenåring. I dette perspektivet kommer filmmeldingen som et livgivende pust: Norge skal være et attraktivt innspillingsland. De regionale fondene skal konsolideres. Insentivordningen skal endelig ut i livet.

Men noen skjær i sjøen finnes fortsatt.

Den nasjonale filmkommisjonen

I 2006 var den nasjonale filmkommisjonen finansiert med 3.5 mill. kroner som en egen stiftelse lagt til Bergen. I arbeidet med Veiviseren anbefalte både Einarssonutvalget, daværende NFI, Norsk filmfond og samtlige regionale filmorganisasjoner at filmkommisjonen burde få en direkte bevilgning over Næringsdepartementets budsjett. Likefullt gjorde Kulturdepartementet i 2007 en vurdering av at filmkommisjonen burde bli innlemmet i Norsk filminstitutt: Et samlet ansvar hos NFI ville utløse synergieffekter.

Synergieffektene uteble, og istedet fikk den nasjonale filmkommisjonen innskrenket sitt handlingsrom og mandat.

I kjølvannet vokste regionale filmkommisjoner frem i Stavanger, Bergen og Trondheim, men med svak og midlertidig finansiering fra fylkeskommuner med stadig strammere økonomi. Kun Vestnorsk filmkommisjon i Bergen har hatt grunnlag for kontinuerlig drift fra 2007 til dags dato, og brakt prosjekter som Ex Machina og Sunshine Superman til landet.

Kulturdepartementet har siden blitt misfornøyd med filmkommisjonens posisjon i NFI, og i Statsbudsjettene for både 2014 og 2015, såvel som i Stortingsmeldingen om regjeringens internasjonale kulturinnsats i 2013, konkluderte departementet med at de ville se nærmere på hvordan oppgavene med å markedsføre og tilrettelegge Norge som opptaksland skal håndteres.

At filmmeldingen nå foreslår å avvikle den nasjonale filmkommisjonen kommer derfor som en overraskelse. Skal Norge bli et attraktivt innspillingsland, og satse millioner på en insentivordning, må det følge et tilsvarende sterkt fokus på omdømme- og merkevarebygging. Norge er fortsatt et ukjent innspillingsland. En nasjonal filmkommisjon skal utvikle en global omdømmeposisjon for Norge som filmland, og skal skaffe Norge konkurransefordeler gjennom å posisjonere seg i et globalt film- og tv-marked verdsatt til over 700 mrd kr.

Den internasjonale filmbransjen har kanskje fokus på bunnlinje og resultater, men filmprosjekter drives frem av personlige relasjoner. Norge har behov for et kontaktpunkt som kan rådgi utenlandske produsenter, regissører, produksjonsdesignere, linjeprodusenter og location scouter om insentivordning og fond; om lokasjoner, topografi og logistikk; om norske fagfolk og talenter, utstyrsleverandører, infrastruktur og produksjonsselskap; om visum, innførsel av utstyr, mva-spørsmål, arbeidsrett og skattespørsmål; om kompliserte filmtillatelser, ferdsel i utmark og nasjonalparker; om samarbeid med departementer, ambassader, reiselivsinteresser og statlige etater.

Det er et arbeid som krever statlig finansiering.

«Hvis det blir innført en insentivordning vil regionene selv ha de nødvendige insentivene for å utarbeide gode filmkommisjonsløsninger (…) Også lokale og regionale myndigheter kan ha en sentral rolle i filmkommisjonsarbeidet», foreslår filmmeldingen. Men har virkelig fylkeskommunene økonomi til en vesentlig styrking og langsiktig drift av de regionale filmkommisjonene? Har lokale myndigheter kapasitet til å utvikle sterke kunderelasjoner til ledende filmprodusenter i Beijing, Los Angeles og Mumbai? Bør ikke markedsføringen av Norge som innspillingsland sees i sammenheng med øvrig nasjonalt arbeid for nærings- og norgesfremme?

Når staten nå legger en insentivordning på bordet, vil sannsynligvis flere regionale filmkommisjoner komme på beina. Vestnorsk filmkommisjon vil fortsatt ha et internasjonalt fokus, og sørge for at en norsk insentivordning møter de internasjonale prosjektene med størst verdiskapingspotensiale for regionen.

Men, arbeidet med å representere Norge som innspillingsland må anerkjennes som en nasjonal oppgave. En fristilt nasjonalt filmkommisjon, som en egen stiftelse utenfor statlige forvaltningsorgan, må styrke de regionene som satser, og samtidig representere de regionene som ikke ser et potensiale for internasjonalt arbeid. Norge bør heller ta modell av Nederland: Da Nederland lanserte sin insentivordning (mai 2014), gjorde de dette samtidig som de lanserte en filmkommisjon med budsjett på €600.000.

En filmkommisjon, med en insentivordning som følgesvenn, kan bli den absolutt viktigste aktøren for Norges synlighet i verden. Intet mindre.

Det er et arbeid som er verdt statlig finansiering.

Insentivordningen

«Incentive schemes, with their automatic application, allow film producers to factor in a foreseeable amount of funding already in the development phase», står det å lese i et EU-notat. En insentivordnings fremste kvalitet skal altså være en forutsigbarhet som gir produsenter anledning til å planlegge lokalisering og finansiering av produksjoner tidlig i utviklingsarbeidet. Filmkommisjonene har her en nøkkelrolle, og skal bistå produsenter med hvordan de kan factor in a foreseeable amount of funding.

Filmmeldingen går i motsatt vei: Filmkommisjonen skal avvikles, og insentivordningen blir neppe utpreget foreseeable. «Budsjettrammen til en eventuell insentivordning må innrettes etter de årlige budsjettprosessene. Av den grunn vil det være behov for å prioritere mellom kvalifiserte søkere dersom totalt søknadsbeløp overstiger fastsatt budsjettramme», heter det i filmmeldingen.

Widvey peker selv på Island som en modell for den norske ordningen, men islendingene selv peker på nettopp forutsigbarhet som den viktigste årsaken til veksten landet har opplevd: En insentivordning som er enkel og forutsigbar, uten søknadsfrist, uten tak, uten begrensninger. Kvalifiserer filmen gjennom kulturtesten er du i gang. Uten å ta modell av disse kvalitetene, kan ikke Widvey hevde at den islandske er rettesnoren for en norsk ordning.

En begrenset budsjettramme vil skape en rekke utfordringer: Skal ordningen ha søknadsfrister? Hvordan skal det prioriteres mellom prosjekter? Hva blir øvre tak per prosjekt? Blir det først til møllen? Hvilken budsjettramme har insentivordningen om 2-3 år når prosjektet er klar for opptak?

Nå har riktignok også Island en budsjettramme på insentivordningen, fastsatt etter forventet produksjonsaktivitet, men denne kan justeres i løpet av året ved behov. Vil Widvey sikre en tilsvarende fleksibilitet som på Island? I en tid der oljejobber forsvinner og landet er i omstilling, bør Widvey ha politisk rom til en økt satsing på en internasjonal vekstnæring som film og tv: Per kapita investerer New York det dobbelte av Norge i den audiovisuelle sektoren, mer grisgrendte Island investerer nærmere det firedobbelte av Norge.

Widvey har lovet en insentivordning på et europeisk nivå. Fra 2016 og framover vil dette nivået være nærmere 30% enn 20%. Den islandske ordningen ligger i dag på 20%, men skal evalueres i 2016. Ingen vil bli overrasket om Island kommer ut med en styrket ordning på 25% – 30% i 2017: Island har opplevd en vekst i omsetning i film- og tv-sektoren på 300% i perioden 2010-2014, og insentivordningen har bidratt til et kapasitetsløft for bransjen som helhet.

Forskriften om innretning av insentivordningen utarbeides nå, og vil sendes på høring til høsten. Det er en lang rekke ubesvarte spørsmål som departementet må finne svar på: Hvordan vil kulturtesten se ut? Vil det være krav til minimumsforbruk? Vil det være en nedre budsjetterskel for tv-drama? Vil insentivene rateutbetales på linje med andre NFI-tilskudd? Hvordan vil komiteen som gjør innstillinger se ut? Hvilke funksjoner skal knyttes til forvaltningen i Bergen?

Ex Machina

De regionale fondene

Det er allerede klart at insentivordningen vil gjelde både norske og utenlandske produksjoner, men det skal ikke bli adgang til å kombinere en insentivordning med produksjonstilskudd fra NFI. Insentivordningen blir dermed ikke et verktøy for å hindre unødvendig utflagging av norske produksjoner, og departementet vil heller ikke innføre territorialitetskrav på NFI sine produksjonstilskudd.

Her kommer en styrking av de regionale fondene inn i bildet. De regionale fondene med størst aktivitet vil trolig styrkes vesentlig, men må konsolidere seg i større regioner for å bli tildelt midler fra 2016 av.

Fondene vil få tilsvarende regelverk som NFI, og kanskje vil dette også innebære at fondenes statlige midler må kanaliseres videre som tilskudd (og ikke som investeringsmidler). Tilskuddsmidler i de regionale fondene vil gi landet en motvekt til norske filmprosjekter som søker seg til utenlandske insentiver. Dette vil også introdusere et interessant trappesteg for utenlandske filmprosjekter som søker seg til Norge: En norsk serviceprodusent kan hente inn finansiering via insentivordningen, og med en oppgradert status som samprodusent i tillegg hente tilskudd fra de regionale fondene.

Så blir det spennende å se om Oslo trives i skyggen av Stockholm, København, Bergen og Trondheim, eller om også Oslo kommune vil komme på banen med egne filmambisjoner.

Det er nok første gang i historien at to norske nabodalfører nå står samtidig på kinoplakaten i USA. At Ex Machina og Sunshine Superman skaper oppmerksomhet og verdier både for norsk kultur, reiseliv og næringsliv hersker det ingen tvil om. Anslagsvis 3 millioner amerikanere har nå sett Ex Machina, og Valldal og Juvet landskapshotell har fått blest i magasiner som American Cinematographer, Wallpaper og Independent.

Vanity Fair sier det kanskje enklest i sin omtale av Ex Machina: Go ahead and start planning your trip to Norway. Vi får håpe departementet styrer unna en annenrangs insentivordning, slik at vi kan komme med en tilsvarende oppfordring til verdens filmskapere.

Sigmund Elias Holm er leder for Vestnorsk filmkommisjon, www.wnfc.no, og er styremedlem i Association of Film Commissioners International – www.afci.org

Wall Street rises – HegnarOnline

US stock markets rises gently Wednesday.

Dow Jones is up 0.19 percent to 17,938, the Nasdaq 0.22 percent to 5.066, while the broader S & amp; P 500 index put on 0.16 percent to 2.101.

Follow developments here.

Pending Yellen
Investors have their eyes on today’s monetary policy meeting of the Federal Reserve, where they will look for concrete signs of when the first increased the rates come.

It is hoped that Governor Janet Yellen will eliminate the list of potential dates for interest rate increases, a list that extends from September to late next year.

– This meeting may give fight important clues not only about when the first interest rate increase is coming, but also (and probably more important) the pace at which future rate hikes will come, writes analyst Richard Perry in Hantec Markets according to MarketWatch in a note.

Duo falls after figures
Among individual stocks fall FedEx 2.8 percent to $ 177 after adding up disappointing quarterly results.

Oracle will release its figures for closing, and is unchanged at $ 44.64.

Adobe Systems fall 0.9 percent to $ 79.22 after the company presented its quarterly report after the close yesterday. The company behind including Photoshop presented weak outlook for Q2.

We also take that energy stocks leading the way, in line with rising oil prices.

Recipient Email – HegnarOnline

US stock markets rises gently Wednesday.

Dow Jones is up 0.19 percent to 17,938, the Nasdaq 0.22 percent to 5.066, while the broader S & amp; P 500 index put on 0.16 percent to 2.101.

Follow developments here.

Pending Yellen
Investors have their eyes on today’s monetary policy meeting of the Federal Reserve, where they will look for concrete signs of when the first increased the rates come.

It is hoped that Governor Janet Yellen will eliminate the list of potential dates for interest rate increases, a list that extends from September to late next year.

– This meeting may give important clues fight, not just when the first interest rate increase is coming, but also (and probably more important) the pace at which future rate hikes will come, writes analyst Richard Perry in Hantec Markets according to MarketWatch in a note.

Duo falls after figures
Among individual stocks fall FedEx 2.8 percent to $ 177 after adding up disappointing quarterly results.

Oracle adds presented figures after closing, and is unchanged at $ 44.64.

Adobe Systems fall 0.9 percent to $ 79.22 after the company presented its quarterly report after the close yesterday. The company behind including Photoshop presented weak outlook for Q2.

We also take that energy stocks leading the way, in line with rising oil prices.

No extra money to Brekstad – Valset-strengthening – Fosna people

“).addClass(“ui-effects-wrapper”).css({fontSize:”100%”,background:”transparent”,border:”none”,margin:0,padding:0}),i={width:t.width(),height:t.height()},s=document.activeElement;try{s.id}catch(o){s=document.body}return t.wrap(r),(t[0]===s||e.contains(t[0],s))&&e(s).focus(),r=t.parent(),t.css(“position”)===”static”?(r.css({position:”relative”}),t.css({position:”relative”})):(e.extend(n,{position:t.css(“position”),zIndex:t.css(“z-index”)}),e.each(["top","left","bottom","right"],function(e,r){n[r]=t.css(r),isNaN(parseInt(n[r],10))&&(n[r]=”auto”)}),t.css({position:”relative”,top:0,left:0,right:”auto”,bottom:”auto”})),t.css(i),r.css(n).show()},removeWrapper:function(t){var n=document.activeElement;return t.parent().is(“.ui-effects-wrapper”)&&(t.parent().replaceWith(t),(t[0]===n||e.contains(t[0],n))&&e(n).focus()),t},setTransition:function(t,n,r,i){return i=i||{},e.each(n,function(e,n){var s=t.cssUnit(n);s[0]>0&&(i[n]=s[0]*r+s[1])}),i}}),e.fn.extend({effect:function(){function a(n){function u(){e.isFunction(i)&&i.call(r[0]),e.isFunction(n)&&n()}var r=e(this),i=t.complete,s=t.mode;(r.is(“:hidden”)?s===”hide”:s===”show”)?u():o.call(r[0],t,u)}var t=i.apply(this,arguments),r=t.mode,s=t.queue,o=e.effects.effect[t.effect],u=!o&&n&&e.effects[t.effect];return e.fx.off||!o&&!u?r?this[r](t.duration,t.complete):this.each(function(){t.complete&&t.complete.call(this)}):o?s===!1?this.each(a):this.queue(s||”fx”,a):u.call(this,{options:t,duration:t.duration,callback:t.complete,mode:t.mode})},_show:e.fn.show,show:function(e){if(s(e))return this._show.apply(this,arguments);var t=i.apply(this,arguments);return t.mode=”show”,this.effect.call(this,t)},_hide:e.fn.hide,hide:function(e){if(s(e))return this._hide.apply(this,arguments);var t=i.apply(this,arguments);return t.mode=”hide”,this.effect.call(this,t)},__toggle:e.fn.toggle,toggle:function(t){if(s(t)||typeof t==”boolean”||e.isFunction(t))return this.__toggle.apply(this,arguments);var n=i.apply(this,arguments);return n.mode=”toggle”,this.effect.call(this,n)},cssUnit:function(t){var n=this.css(t),r=[];return e.each(["em","px","%","pt"],function(e,t){n.indexOf(t)>0&&(r=[parseFloat(n),t])}),r}})}(),function(){var t={};e.each(["Quad","Cubic","Quart","Quint","Expo"],function(e,n){t[n]=function(t){return Math.pow(t,e+2)}}),e.extend(t,{Sine:function(e){return 1-Math.cos(e*Math.PI/2)},Circ:function(e){return 1-Math.sqrt(1-e*e)},Elastic:function(e){return e===0||e===1?e:-Math.pow(2,8*(e-1))*Math.sin(((e-1)*80-7.5)*Math.PI/15)},Back:function(e){return e*e*(3*e-2)},Bounce:function(e){var t,n=4;while(e1&&b.splice.apply(b,[1,0].concat(b.splice(w,c+1))),r.dequeue()}})(jQuery);(function(e,t){e.effects.effect.clip=function(t,n){var r=e(this),i=["position","top","bottom","left","right","height","width"],s=e.effects.setMode(r,t.mode||”hide”),o=s===”show”,u=t.direction||”vertical”,a=u===”vertical”,f=a?”height”:”width”,l=a?”top”:”left”,c={},h,p,d;e.effects.save(r,i),r.show(),h=e.effects.createWrapper(r).css({overflow:”hidden”}),p=r[0].tagName===”IMG”?h:r,d=p[f](),o&&(p.css(f,0),p.css(l,d/2)),c[f]=o?d:0,c[l]=o?0:d/2,p.animate(c,{queue:!1,duration:t.duration,easing:t.easing,complete:function(){o||r.hide(),e.effects.restore(r,i),e.effects.removeWrapper(r),n()}})}})(jQuery);(function(e,t){e.effects.effect.drop=function(t,n){var r=e(this),i=["position","top","bottom","left","right","opacity","height","width"],s=e.effects.setMode(r,t.mode||”hide”),o=s===”show”,u=t.direction||”left”,a=u===”up”||u===”down”?”top”:”left”,f=u===”up”||u===”left”?”pos”:”neg”,l={opacity:o?1:0},c;e.effects.save(r,i),r.show(),e.effects.createWrapper(r),c=t.distance||r[a==="top"?"outerHeight":"outerWidth"](!0)/2,o&&r.css(“opacity”,0).css(a,f===”pos”?-c:c),l[a]=(o?f===”pos”?”+=”:”-=”:f===”pos”?”-=”:”+=”)+c,r.animate(l,{queue:!1,duration:t.duration,easing:t.easing,complete:function(){s===”hide”&&r.hide(),e.effects.restore(r,i),e.effects.removeWrapper(r),n()}})}})(jQuery);(function(e,t){e.effects.effect.explode=function(t,n){function y(){c.push(this),c.length===r*i&&b()}function b(){s.css({visibility:”visible”}),e(c).remove(),u||s.hide(),n()}var r=t.pieces?Math.round(Math.sqrt(t.pieces)):3,i=r,s=e(this),o=e.effects.setMode(s,t.mode||”hide”),u=o===”show”,a=s.show().css(“visibility”,”hidden”).offset(),f=Math.ceil(s.outerWidth()/i),l=Math.ceil(s.outerHeight()/r),c=[],h,p,d,v,m,g;for(h=0;h

“).css({position:”absolute”,visibility:”visible”,left:-p*f,top:-h*l}).parent().addClass(“ui-effects-explode”).css({position:”absolute”,overflow:”hidden”,width:f,height:l,left:d+(u?m*f:0),top:v+(u?g*l:0),opacity:u?0:1}).animate({left:d+(u?0:m*f),top:v+(u?0:g*l),opacity:u?1:0},t.duration||500,t.easing,y)}}})(jQuery);(function(e,t){e.effects.effect.fade=function(t,n){var r=e(this),i=e.effects.setMode(r,t.mode||”toggle”);r.animate({opacity:i},{queue:!1,duration:t.duration,easing:t.easing,complete:n})}})(jQuery);(function(e,t){e.effects.effect.fold=function(t,n){var r=e(this),i=["position","top","bottom","left","right","height","width"],s=e.effects.setMode(r,t.mode||”hide”),o=s===”show”,u=s===”hide”,a=t.size||15,f=/([0-9]+)%/.exec(a),l=!!t.horizFirst,c=o!==l,h=c?["width","height"]:["height","width"],p=t.duration/2,d,v,m={},g={};e.effects.save(r,i),r.show(),d=e.effects.createWrapper(r).css({overflow:”hidden”}),v=c?[d.width(),d.height()]:[d.height(),d.width()],f&&(a=parseInt(f[1],10)/100*v[u?0:1]),o&&d.css(l?{height:0,width:a}:{height:a,width:0}),m[h[0]]=o?v[0]:a,g[h[1]]=o?v[1]:0,d.animate(m,p,t.easing).animate(g,p,t.easing,function(){u&&r.hide(),e.effects.restore(r,i),e.effects.removeWrapper(r),n()})}})(jQuery);(function(e,t){e.effects.effect.highlight=function(t,n){var r=e(this),i=["backgroundImage","backgroundColor","opacity"],s=e.effects.setMode(r,t.mode||”show”),o={backgroundColor:r.css(“backgroundColor”)};s===”hide”&&(o.opacity=0),e.effects.save(r,i),r.show().css({backgroundImage:”none”,backgroundColor:t.color||”#ffff99″}).animate(o,{queue:!1,duration:t.duration,easing:t.easing,complete:function(){s===”hide”&&r.hide(),e.effects.restore(r,i),n()}})}})(jQuery);(function(e,t){e.effects.effect.pulsate=function(t,n){var r=e(this),i=e.effects.setMode(r,t.mode||”show”),s=i===”show”,o=i===”hide”,u=s||i===”hide”,a=(t.times||5)*2+(u?1:0),f=t.duration/a,l=0,c=r.queue(),h=c.length,p;if(s||!r.is(“:visible”))r.css(“opacity”,0).show(),l=1;for(p=1;p

Claims FRP would accept 7,500 Syrian refugees – Dagbladet.no

Progress politicians have called it irresponsible to accept 8,000 refugees from Syria. But in an internal memo accept FRP to accept 7,500 refugees from the country.

VG has gained access to the note, showing how FRP and Right would present the government’s view. The memo is dated June 4, the day before FRP decided to withdraw from the negotiations in Parliament.

The negotiations ended with a compromise that Norway accepts 8,000 Syrian refugees over three years. There are 2,000 fewer than the Labor Party leader Jonas Gahr Støre and the Socialist Left Party had proposed to take over two years.

SV withdrew from the negotiations. It also made FRP, but the opposite reason: FRP said 8,000 refugees were too many.

– We hope to convince people that they have taken this decision, are irresponsible politicians. We will engage in campaigning on this matter and tell the voters how irresponsible this is, said Progress Party deputy Per Sandberg when it became clear that Norway will receive 8,000 Syrian refugees.

But note that VG now sits on coming it emerged that FRP accept 7,500 refugees, 500 fewer than the compromise ended up.

Sandberg said he was not familiar with the note, which was Progress negotiating deals.

– I do not know to any suggestions. When it had been presented to the group. The existence of working document as a basis for negotiation is perfectly normal, says Sandberg.

None of the other negotiators VG has been in contact with has wanted to comment on the matter.

(NTB)

No redundancies – Glomdalen

This Gospel was written mediated by Councilman Turid Bjerkestrand to all the approximately 400 employees in Grue Tuesday.

Greater relief

– This is a big relief for all parties, and we are very, very pleased that we got to this, commenting alderman decision.

She says that the last pieces of the puzzle came in place Monday night, after it has been working intensively on this the last couple of weeks.

– The peak was in place in the middle of last week, but we could not go out with it until everything was in place, tells Bjerkestrand.

Reduces temporary use

From this she seems overtures from Fagforbundet and Glåmdalen Friday was a bit unlucky, and denies that their initiatives have had an impact on the final result now was presented. But what caused the authorities still avoid layoffs?

At the information meeting in the Town Hall on 18 May illuminated alderman and Human Ellinor Bjerke that over the past 20-years as the council has decided to remove this year must be through layoffs. This is because the basis of academic standards was not possible to resettle more.

– We have conducted consultation meetings with the 60 that were notified of possible termination and thus better received surveyed including the individual’s competence . In addition, we have examined each device and see that there will be no unemployment gradually. We will then reduce temporary use and instead use employees who were notified that they could be fired, explains alderman.

Offered new jobs

During the first five months Grue well spent 7.1 million dollars on temporary workers, and well 2.9 million for hired extra help, according to a note from the trade union based on information from the municipality.

25 employees who were ” threatened “with a denunciation now written offer of transfer nonetheless, that other positions.

In Tuesday’s information circular from the chief administrative officer of the employees stated the following. “It’s made a tremendous effort to resolve the situation. The dialogue with the unions has been good. It is very positive that Grue employer in this way can avoid layoffs. “

Read more about: municipal local politics workplace Grue

Note: FRP would accept 7,500 Syrian refugees – Nettavisen

NTB

Publisert 16.06.15 04:50 Sist oppdatert 16.06.15 09:36

Promotion med annonselenker

– De tallene som nevnes i arbeidsdokumentet, er aldri behandlet i noen av Frps partiorganer, sier partiets innvandringspolitiske talsmann, Mayzar Keshvari.

Fremskrittsparti-politikere har kalt det uansvarlig å ta imot 8.000 flyktninger fra Syria over tre år. Men i et notat aksepterer Frp å ta imot 7.500 flyktninger fra landet over fire år.

VG har fått tilgang til notatet, som viser hvordan Frp og Høyre ville legge fram regjeringens syn.

Notatet er datert 4. juni, dagen før Frp valgte å trekke seg fra forhandlingene på Stortinget. Forhandlingene endte med et kompromiss om at Norge skal ta imot 8.000 syriske flyktninger over tre år.

– De tallene som nevnes i arbeidsdokumentet, er aldri behandlet i noen av Frps partiorganer, understreker innvandringspolitisk talsmann Mazyar Keshvari i Frp overfor NRK tirsdag morgen.

Frps nestleder Per Sandberg har varslet at han vil bruke denne saken i valgkampen.

– Vi skal drive valgkamp på denne saken og fortelle velgerne hvor uansvarlig dette er, sa Sandberg da det ble klart at Norge skal ta imot 8.000 syriske flyktninger.

Sandberg sier han ikke var kjent med notatet, som var Frps forhandlingstilbud.

– Jeg kjenner ikke til noe forslag. Da hadde det blitt lagt fram for gruppen. At det foreligger arbeidsdokumenter til grunn i forhandlinger er helt normalt, sier Sandberg.

Ingen av de andre forhandlerne VG har vært i kontakt med, har ønsket å kommentere saken. (©NTB)

Lik Nettavisen her og få flere ferske nyheter og friske meninger!